All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/22] drm/i915/gem: Separate the ww_mutex walker into its own list
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 08:55:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520075503.10388-19-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200520075503.10388-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In preparation for making eb_vma bigger and heavy to run inn parallel,
we need to stop apply an in-place swap() to reorder around ww_mutex
deadlocks. Keep the array intact and reorder the locks using a dedicated
list.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    | 48 +++++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h             |  6 +++
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 91e77348282a..653e32f79066 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct eb_vma {
 	struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *exec;
 	struct list_head bind_link;
 	struct list_head reloc_link;
+	struct list_head lock_link;
 
 	struct hlist_node node;
 	u32 handle;
@@ -254,6 +255,8 @@ struct i915_execbuffer {
 	/** list of vma that have execobj.relocation_count */
 	struct list_head relocs;
 
+	struct list_head lock;
+
 	/**
 	 * Track the most recently used object for relocations, as we
 	 * frequently have to perform multiple relocations within the same
@@ -399,6 +402,10 @@ static int eb_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 		eb->lut_size = -eb->buffer_count;
 	}
 
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->lock);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -604,6 +611,8 @@ eb_add_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
 		eb_unreserve_vma(ev);
 		list_add_tail(&ev->bind_link, &eb->unbound);
 	}
+
+	list_add_tail(&ev->lock_link, &eb->lock);
 }
 
 static inline int use_cpu_reloc(const struct reloc_cache *cache,
@@ -880,9 +889,6 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 	unsigned int i;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
-
 	for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
 		struct i915_vma *vma;
 
@@ -1789,38 +1795,39 @@ static int eb_relocate(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 
 static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 {
-	const unsigned int count = eb->buffer_count;
 	struct ww_acquire_ctx acquire;
-	unsigned int i;
+	struct eb_vma *ev;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	ww_acquire_init(&acquire, &reservation_ww_class);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-		struct eb_vma *ev = &eb->vma[i];
+	list_for_each_entry(ev, &eb->lock, lock_link) {
 		struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
 
 		err = ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(&vma->resv->lock, &acquire);
 		if (err == -EDEADLK) {
-			GEM_BUG_ON(i == 0);
-			do {
-				int j = i - 1;
+			struct eb_vma *unlock = ev, *en;
 
-				ww_mutex_unlock(&eb->vma[j].vma->resv->lock);
-
-				swap(eb->vma[i],  eb->vma[j]);
-			} while (--i);
+			list_for_each_entry_safe_continue_reverse(unlock, en, &eb->lock, lock_link) {
+				ww_mutex_unlock(&unlock->vma->resv->lock);
+				list_move_tail(&unlock->lock_link, &eb->lock);
+			}
 
+			GEM_BUG_ON(!list_is_first(&ev->lock_link, &eb->lock));
 			err = ww_mutex_lock_slow_interruptible(&vma->resv->lock,
 							       &acquire);
 		}
-		if (err)
-			break;
+		if (err) {
+			list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(ev, &eb->lock, lock_link)
+				ww_mutex_unlock(&ev->vma->resv->lock);
+
+			ww_acquire_fini(&acquire);
+			goto err_skip;
+		}
 	}
 	ww_acquire_done(&acquire);
 
-	while (i--) {
-		struct eb_vma *ev = &eb->vma[i];
+	list_for_each_entry(ev, &eb->lock, lock_link) {
 		struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
 		unsigned int flags = ev->flags;
 		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
@@ -2121,9 +2128,10 @@ static int eb_parse(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 	if (err)
 		goto err_trampoline;
 
-	eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].vma = i915_vma_get(shadow);
-	eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
 	eb->batch = &eb->vma[eb->buffer_count++];
+	eb->batch->vma = i915_vma_get(shadow);
+	eb->batch->flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
+	list_add_tail(&eb->batch->lock_link, &eb->lock);
 	eb->vma[eb->buffer_count].vma = NULL;
 
 	eb->trampoline = trampoline;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
index 03a73d2bd50d..28813806bc19 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
@@ -266,6 +266,12 @@ static inline int list_is_last_rcu(const struct list_head *list,
 	return READ_ONCE(list->next) == head;
 }
 
+#define list_for_each_entry_safe_continue_reverse(pos, n, head, member)	\
+	for (pos = list_prev_entry(pos, member),			\
+		n = list_prev_entry(pos, member);			\
+	     &pos->member != (head);					\
+	     pos = n, n = list_prev_entry(n, member))
+
 /*
  * Wait until the work is finally complete, even if it tries to postpone
  * by requeueing itself. Note, that if the worker never cancels itself,
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-20  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-20  7:54 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/22] drm/i915/gem: Suppress some random warnings Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/22] drm/i915/execlists: Shortcircuit queue_prio() for no internal levels Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/22] drm/i915: Avoid using rq->engine after free during i915_fence_release Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/22] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection back to the context Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/22] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/22] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/22] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/22] drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/22] dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/22] drm/syncobj: Allow use of dma-fence-proxy Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/22] drm/i915/gem: Teach execbuf how to wait on future syncobj Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/22] drm/i915/gem: Allow combining submit-fences with syncobj Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/22] drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/22] drm/i915/gt: Use built-in active intel_context reference Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/22] drm/i915: Drop I915_IDLE_ENGINES_TIMEOUT Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/22] drm/i915: Always defer fenced work to the worker Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/22] drm/i915/gem: Assign context id for async work Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/22] drm/i915: Export a preallocate variant of i915_active_acquire() Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:55 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-05-20  7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/22] drm/i915/gem: Asynchronous GTT unbinding Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/22] drm/i915/gem: Bind the fence async for execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/22] drm/i915: Micro-optimise i915_request_completed() Chris Wilson
2020-05-20  8:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/22] drm/i915/gem: Suppress some random warnings Patchwork
2020-05-20  8:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-05-20  9:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-20 20:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-04  4:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/22] drm/i915: Allow some leniency in PCU reads Chris Wilson
2020-05-04  4:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/22] drm/i915/gem: Separate the ww_mutex walker into its own list Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200520075503.10388-19-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.