All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] builtin/checkout: simplify metadata initialization
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 22:37:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520223737.GT6362@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmu62ws88.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2459 bytes --]

On 2020-05-20 at 15:17:43, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
> 
> > When we call init_checkout_metadata in reset_tree, we want to pass the
> > object ID of the commit in question so that it can be passed to filters,
> > or if there is no commit, the tree.  We anticipated this latter case,
> > which can occur elsewhere in the checkout code, but it cannot occur
> > here, since reset_tree is called only (indirectly) via switch_branches,
> > which requires that we have a valid commit.  switch_branches dies if we
> > lack a name and cannot produce a commit from HEAD, and its caller dies
> > if we do have a branch name but still lack a commit pointer.
> >
> > Since we know we must always have a valid commit structure in this case,
> > let's remove the dead code paths and just refer to the commit structure.
> > This simplifies the code and makes it easier for the reader.
> 
> builtin/checkout.c::merge_working_tree() has these lines in its
> earlier part:
> 
> 	if (opts->new_orphan_branch && opts->orphan_from_empty_tree) {
> 		if (new_branch_info->commit)
> 			BUG("'switch --orphan' should never acc...");
> 		new_tree = parse_tree_indirect(the_hash_algo->empty_tree);
> 	} else
> 		new_tree = get_commit_tree(new_branch_info->commit);
> 	if (opts->discard_changes) {
> 		ret = reset_tree(new_tree, opts, 1, writeout_error, new_branch_info);
> 		if (ret)
> 			return ret;
> 	...
> 
> So, when orphan && orphan-from-empty are both set, we must not have
> commit, and then if discard is also there, we end up passing
> new_brnach_info that has NULL in its commit.

Good point.  I missed that part.

> Perhaps the "orphan && orphan-from-empty" is a dead combination and
> we won't hit the codepath and that is why this change is safe?  I
> dunno.

It looks like it's only triggered from git switch with --orphan, not
with git checkout.  And furthermore, it seems we require --force or
--discard-changes to trigger that case, which we don't have anywhere in
the testsuite.

I'll come up with a different patch.  I'll probably just set a NULL
object ID there, since if we're checking out a new orphan branch, we
won't have any files to check out, and therefore there's no possibility
that we'll actually use the value for a filter process (since there are
no files to filter).
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-20 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-15 17:22 Git Test Coverage Report (v2.27.0-rc0) Derrick Stolee
2020-05-19 12:11 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-05-19 20:07   ` René Scharfe
2020-05-19 23:42   ` brian m. carlson
2020-05-20  1:38     ` brian m. carlson
2020-05-19 18:31 ` [PATCH] t4067: make rename detection test output raw diff Jonathan Tan
2020-05-19 19:00   ` Derrick Stolee
2020-05-20  1:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] builtin/checkout: simplify metadata initialization brian m. carlson
2020-05-20 15:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-20 22:37     ` brian m. carlson [this message]
2020-05-21  2:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve Fix code coverage for checkout brian m. carlson
2020-05-21  2:07   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] builtin/checkout: simplify metadata initialization brian m. carlson
2020-05-21 17:35     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-23 12:22       ` brian m. carlson
2020-05-21  2:07   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] t2060: add a test for switch with --orphan and --discard-changes brian m. carlson
2020-05-21 12:38   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve Fix code coverage for checkout Derrick Stolee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200520223737.GT6362@camp.crustytoothpaste.net \
    --to=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    --cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.