From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEFAC433E1 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 06:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04EF207F7 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 06:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="HH7ZSBGa" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387659AbgEWGqq (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2020 02:46:46 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:48950 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387612AbgEWGqp (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2020 02:46:45 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f1b960084fca2944bfbd32f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f1b:9600:84fc:a294:4bfb:d32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 7B6771EC0322; Sat, 23 May 2020 08:46:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1590216404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=mjUjsegmvcQg4u0dywhJ/yTV9Lh8VueAxwVooMoA3RU=; b=HH7ZSBGa13XLAHMq09BzwawT3y36ZWabw46h9nhXz+VMcuVWFs61TRXrydjjvcpqHF9l39 VX5jPF3zWudPY8+xAa6exbgsRLFUSRvTvuG8ocGSxw30/rpUPUC/fBDCBB1HBFn8YPudsg vjcVCxjMwxj4mkp1B82gukUtSgKLpjc= Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 08:46:43 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , elver@google.com Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <20200523064643.GA27431@zn.tnic> References: <20200522033119.1bbd99c5@canb.auug.org.au> <20200521173520.GL6608@willie-the-truck> <20200522171708.5f392fde@canb.auug.org.au> <20200522174944.1a1732fa@canb.auug.org.au> <20200523001223.GA23921@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200523001223.GA23921@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Marco, Thomas, is there any better setup I can provide Stephen? Or > is the next-20200519 -rcu tree the best we have right now? I've queued the fixes yesterday into tip:locking/kcsan and tglx said something about you having to rebase anyway. I guess you can find him on IRC at some point later. :) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette