All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@roeck-us.net,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] software node: implement software_node_unregister()
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 17:30:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200524153041.2361-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)

Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying
to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create
software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a
time.

This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with
parent -> children representations.  Children always need to be removed
before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the
case.

Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new
function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards
order.

Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier")
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/base/swnode.c    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 include/linux/property.h |  1 +
 lib/test_printf.c        |  4 +++-
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c
index de8d3543e8fe..770b1f47a625 100644
--- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
+++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
@@ -712,17 +712,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register_nodes);
  * @nodes: Zero terminated array of software nodes to be unregistered
  *
  * Unregister multiple software nodes at once.
+ *
+ * NOTE: Be careful using this call if the nodes had parent pointers set up in
+ * them before registering.  If so, it is wiser to remove the nodes
+ * individually, in the correct order (child before parent) instead of relying
+ * on the sequential order of the list of nodes in the array.
  */
 void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes)
 {
-	struct swnode *swnode;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) {
-		swnode = software_node_to_swnode(&nodes[i]);
-		if (swnode)
-			fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode);
-	}
+	for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++)
+		software_node_unregister(&nodes[i]);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister_nodes);
 
@@ -741,6 +742,20 @@ int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register);
 
+/**
+ * software_node_unregister - Unregister static software node
+ * @node: The software node to be unregistered
+ */
+void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node)
+{
+	struct swnode *swnode;
+
+	swnode = software_node_to_swnode(node);
+	if (swnode)
+		fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister);
+
 struct fwnode_handle *
 fwnode_create_software_node(const struct property_entry *properties,
 			    const struct fwnode_handle *parent)
diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
index d86de017c689..0d4099b4ce1f 100644
--- a/include/linux/property.h
+++ b/include/linux/property.h
@@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ int software_node_register_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes);
 void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes);
 
 int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node);
+void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node);
 
 int software_node_notify(struct device *dev, unsigned long action);
 
diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c
index 6b1622f4d7c2..fc63b8959d42 100644
--- a/lib/test_printf.c
+++ b/lib/test_printf.c
@@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ static void __init fwnode_pointer(void)
 	test(second_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[1]));
 	test(third_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[2]));
 
-	software_node_unregister_nodes(softnodes);
+	software_node_unregister(&softnodes[2]);
+	software_node_unregister(&softnodes[1]);
+	software_node_unregister(&softnodes[0]);
 }
 
 static void __init
-- 
2.26.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-24 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-24 15:30 Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-05-24 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] kobject: send KOBJ_REMOVE uevent when the object is removed from sysfs Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-25 11:07   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-25 22:49   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-05-26  5:58     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-26  8:26       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-27  7:50         ` Heikki Krogerus
2020-05-27  8:34           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-27  9:01             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-27 14:34               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-27 22:25               ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-28 10:57                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-28 13:56                   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-28 14:03                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-24 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] software node: implement software_node_unregister() Guenter Roeck
2020-05-25  2:44   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-05-25  7:59 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-25 11:24 ` Heikki Krogerus
2020-05-26  0:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-05-28 20:25 ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200524153041.2361-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.