From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6816BC433DF for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 08:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F6D20663 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 08:13:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 34F6D20663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51202 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdUiH-0008Up-Dt for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 04:13:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdUbJ-0002hJ-Ck for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 04:06:17 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:48177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdUbH-0004j1-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 04:06:16 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 2GQwp0LrKjYpl04E1Lo/LL+TUhiMMDWdM5V6qOqZwf4mKiJm7yV7DN0aebNbUZ8bd4bl25gDke zHmW/FOnfNWQ== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 May 2020 01:06:12 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 3B3jA/F85j8oh8aF6XvKuRB/twdFUD8WT0WK1oDETgI//WaZbw4zNvd4bSpLBcJWXhArzXzQtq Tncu9xu/STMw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,436,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="441994311" Received: from yangzhon-virtual.bj.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.238.144.101]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2020 01:06:10 -0700 Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 15:57:38 +0800 From: Yang Zhong To: Stefano Garzarella Subject: Re: About the PVH in Seabios Message-ID: <20200526075738.GB28145@yangzhon-Virtual> References: <20200526071826.GA28145@yangzhon-Virtual> <20200526073651.mqnawlzjcqz2452t@steredhat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200526073651.mqnawlzjcqz2452t@steredhat> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.55.52.43; envelope-from=yang.zhong@intel.com; helo=mga05.intel.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/26 04:06:12 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = FreeBSD 9.x or newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 09:36:51AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > Hi Yang, > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:18:26PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > The current PVH has been implemented in Qemu and Qboot/uefi, i am not > > familiar with the PVH implementation history, and found there is no > > PVH support in Seabios, my question is do we have plan to support > > PVH in Seabios? thanks. > > We developed an optionrom in QEMU (pc-bios/optionrom/pvh*) that is used > with SeaBIOS to boot a PVH image. > > So we don't need to change SeaBIOS since it already supports optionroms. > Currently when you use a PVH image in QEMU, SeaBIOS is used as default > choice with the PVH optionrom. > Stefano, thanks for your information, i only checked the pvh changes in Seabios code and ignored optionrom changes, thanks again. Regards, Yang > Cheers, > Stefano