From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rich Felker Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:55:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support Message-Id: <20200601025514.GS1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx> List-Id: References: <20200424221948.1120587-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20200507143552.GA28683@infradead.org> <20200528054600.GA29717@infradead.org> <20200528161416.GY1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200529143059.GA25475@infradead.org> <20200529175335.GK1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <8b4ff7fe-c10c-fc8e-72bc-88ef69bdb2b4@landley.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: Rob Landley , Christoph Hellwig , Arnd Bergmann , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Torvalds On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:03:13AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 5/31/20 5:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > > On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for > >>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from, > >>> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing > >>> mine. This is all really silly since there are ridiculously many > >>> independent channels I could cryptographically validate identity > >>> through with vanishing probability that they're all compromised. For > >>> the time being I'll reactivate my repo on git.musl-libc.org. > >> > >> May I suggest to pick up these patches, for example? There might be > >> more I missed, but getting these merged should already help a lot with > >> the clean-up of arch/sh. > > > > Does that include the 2 fixes to build with current binutils I made puppy eyes > > about last -rc7 (in march)? > > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m8544749818664&w=2 > Yes, listed as "[PATCH 1/2] arch/sh: vmlinux.scr". > > @Rich: Do you think you can merge all those fixes in your local tree within > the next days and send a PR to Linus? > > Otherwise, I can volunteer to become a third maintainer for arch/sh as I have > the hardware for testing and can accept patches and send PRs. > > We shouldn't let contributors to arch/sh wait for too long. Yes, I'll try to get my tree ready for next/PR use tomorrow. Rich From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDC8C433E0 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 02:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296C0206A4 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 02:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727826AbgFACzX (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2020 22:55:23 -0400 Received: from brightrain.aerifal.cx ([216.12.86.13]:36532 "EHLO brightrain.aerifal.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727119AbgFACzV (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2020 22:55:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 22:55:15 -0400 From: Rich Felker To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: Rob Landley , Christoph Hellwig , Arnd Bergmann , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support Message-ID: <20200601025514.GS1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20200424221948.1120587-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20200507143552.GA28683@infradead.org> <20200528054600.GA29717@infradead.org> <20200528161416.GY1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200529143059.GA25475@infradead.org> <20200529175335.GK1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <8b4ff7fe-c10c-fc8e-72bc-88ef69bdb2b4@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:03:13AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 5/31/20 5:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > > On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for > >>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from, > >>> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing > >>> mine. This is all really silly since there are ridiculously many > >>> independent channels I could cryptographically validate identity > >>> through with vanishing probability that they're all compromised. For > >>> the time being I'll reactivate my repo on git.musl-libc.org. > >> > >> May I suggest to pick up these patches, for example? There might be > >> more I missed, but getting these merged should already help a lot with > >> the clean-up of arch/sh. > > > > Does that include the 2 fixes to build with current binutils I made puppy eyes > > about last -rc7 (in march)? > > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=158544749818664&w=2 > Yes, listed as "[PATCH 1/2] arch/sh: vmlinux.scr". > > @Rich: Do you think you can merge all those fixes in your local tree within > the next days and send a PR to Linus? > > Otherwise, I can volunteer to become a third maintainer for arch/sh as I have > the hardware for testing and can accept patches and send PRs. > > We shouldn't let contributors to arch/sh wait for too long. Yes, I'll try to get my tree ready for next/PR use tomorrow. Rich