> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:46:49PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > +
> > +		prog = READ_ONCE(rcpu->prog);
> >  		for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > -			void *f = frames[i];
> > +			void *f = xdp_frames[i];
> >  			struct page *page = virt_to_page(f);
> > +			struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> > +			struct xdp_buff xdp;
> > +			u32 act;
> > +			int err;
> >  
> >  			/* Bring struct page memory area to curr CPU. Read by
> >  			 * build_skb_around via page_is_pfmemalloc(), and when
> >  			 * freed written by page_frag_free call.
> >  			 */
> >  			prefetchw(page);
> > +			if (!prog) {
> > +				frames[nframes++] = xdp_frames[i];
> > +				continue;
> > +			}
> 
> I'm not sure compiler will be smart enough to hoist !prog check out of the loop.
> Otherwise default cpumap case will be a bit slower.
> I'd like to see performance numbers before/after and acks from folks
> who are using cpumap before applying.
> Also please add selftest for it. samples/bpf/ in patch 6 is not enough.

Hi Alexei,

thx for the review. I will add a selftest and some performance numbers in v2.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> Other than the above the feature looks good to me. It nicely complements devmap.