All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix an integer overflow in logical block size
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:39:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200602213921.GA229073@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2001150833180.31494@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 08:35:25AM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Logical block size has type unsigned short. That means that it can be at
> most 32768. However, there are architectures that can run with 64k pages
> (for example arm64) and on these architectures, it may be possible to
> create block devices with 64k block size.
> 
> For exmaple (run this on an architecture with 64k pages):
> # modprobe brd rd_size=1048576
> # dmsetup create cache --table "0 `blockdev --getsize /dev/ram0` writecache s /dev/ram0 /dev/ram1 65536 0"
> # mkfs.ext4 -b 65536 /dev/mapper/cache
> # mount -t ext4 /dev/mapper/cache /mnt/test
> 
> Mount will fail with this error because it tries to read the superblock using 2-sector
> access:
>   device-mapper: writecache: I/O is not aligned, sector 2, size 1024, block size 65536
>   EXT4-fs (dm-0): unable to read superblock
> 
> This patch changes the logical block size from unsigned short to unsigned
> int to avoid the overflow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

Mikulas, a question about this patch.  In crypt_io_hints() in
drivers/md/dm-crypt.c there is:

       limits->logical_block_size =
                max_t(unsigned short, limits->logical_block_size, cc->sector_size);

Shouldn't that have been changed to 'unsigned int', now that
limits->logical_block_size is 'unsigned int' rather than 'unsigned short'?

- Eric

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-02 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15 13:35 [PATCH] block: fix an integer overflow in logical block size Mikulas Patocka
2020-01-15 13:35 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-01-16  1:59 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-01-16  3:02 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-16  4:43 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-02 21:39 ` Eric Biggers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200602213921.GA229073@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.