From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318EEC433E0 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10342207ED for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591217860; bh=SA51jkVVsXD1P0/zuGau7LRvGwUl3rZwCvD7U14lHT0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=i3Qz8JjViVhwlizNVpf6EHEhhjV9o1NhZFjFCsfq48RUuuh1MdKNYKJ99Yp+kNItH nuZv8XflWJuxSFbwoZ+qNQcdR0AeQN1pX4ZRaHk3ZoKfGCICPxPYR2Gr37JMzcngfS O02Fb8PGXot+2dhYr3DnBhxVTrPsWP1/FVF84Q/4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726202AbgFCU5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:57:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39446 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725922AbgFCU5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:57:39 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41A652067B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591217858; bh=SA51jkVVsXD1P0/zuGau7LRvGwUl3rZwCvD7U14lHT0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R+x3Nw9u+7nEi0n9itYHOzSOxlNljPSeK///Mzs4PX4z9nuno+Auj7Ou/r8TfYcQj uztZdVJR2O9plQuWNmfFkbrIVuKApSrGtnDYKJxw1kdVo7XgNWC760pouhfMKv0YAR x/btwctWzOGNMZ8iDeLFOfWGWVXq4qA+zZh+kfGg= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:57:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ira Weiny Cc: Guenter Roeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "David S. Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Chris Zankel , Max Filippov , Dan Williams , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Christian Koenig , Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice Message-Id: <20200603135736.e7b5ded0082a81ae6d9067a0@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20200507150004.1423069-8-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200518184843.3029640-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200519165422.GA5838@roeck-us.net> <20200519184031.GB3356843@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200519194215.GA71941@roeck-us.net> <20200520051315.GA3660833@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for > > > sparc 32 bit... > > > > > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > > > > > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > > > > > > > That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches. > > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Is there another test I need to run? This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might have issues on various architectures. Can folks please provide an update on the testing status? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 20:57:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice Message-Id: <20200603135736.e7b5ded0082a81ae6d9067a0@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: References: <20200507150004.1423069-8-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200518184843.3029640-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200519165422.GA5838@roeck-us.net> <20200519184031.GB3356843@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200519194215.GA71941@roeck-us.net> <20200520051315.GA3660833@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ira Weiny Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Helge Deller , x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Guenter Roeck , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Borislav Petkov , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for > > > sparc 32 bit... > > > > > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > > > > > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > > > > > > > That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches. > > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Is there another test I need to run? This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might have issues on various architectures. Can folks please provide an update on the testing status? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1542C433DF for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8CA2067B for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R+x3Nw9u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4F8CA2067B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ch9M3tnkzDqdv for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 06:59:19 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux-foundation.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=akpm@linux-foundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=R+x3Nw9u; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ch7T0W7RzDqd7 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 06:57:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41A652067B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591217858; bh=SA51jkVVsXD1P0/zuGau7LRvGwUl3rZwCvD7U14lHT0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R+x3Nw9u+7nEi0n9itYHOzSOxlNljPSeK///Mzs4PX4z9nuno+Auj7Ou/r8TfYcQj uztZdVJR2O9plQuWNmfFkbrIVuKApSrGtnDYKJxw1kdVo7XgNWC760pouhfMKv0YAR x/btwctWzOGNMZ8iDeLFOfWGWVXq4qA+zZh+kfGg= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:57:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ira Weiny Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice Message-Id: <20200603135736.e7b5ded0082a81ae6d9067a0@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20200507150004.1423069-8-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200518184843.3029640-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200519165422.GA5838@roeck-us.net> <20200519184031.GB3356843@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200519194215.GA71941@roeck-us.net> <20200520051315.GA3660833@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Helge Deller , x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Guenter Roeck , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Borislav Petkov , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for > > > sparc 32 bit... > > > > > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > > > > > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > > > > > > > That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches. > > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Is there another test I need to run? This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might have issues on various architectures. Can folks please provide an update on the testing status? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4AFC433DF for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F02F2074B for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="lnz5zpKu"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R+x3Nw9u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1F02F2074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NW8sG+e8CMajiexf0RIwclkiwy6pe/a0AGtUmk93SWI=; b=lnz5zpKuBmsd99 20pLHFrbEzCY/Q3y2+9wN+c7NtY0m8ewedbERGrJdVRSNt6/qy5Tek6hcjhIlz35ntdywZ3+p/Qne z5JWayNwi44qaU0H7fSSVU2OrjRFr1kIxS0fdj+E9yMz+b9af7Dd6YqUddDMniwaD4a+ymZAROOlo oIJG+YFks2AJZ98+C2uQdtGgiozq6Df8S6zmcqORSYYomMCT09Usp98AOBwvqlIhdzeLj270ZeGo8 5Q/TwUGRtj4tfHxSQPCi9V8Iurg6v2d0hdS4d6/85HHfghnJeKt/v7OrOtWGcrbri/4ql/uQ03u5c w2YRQwnhLmQbCeoJ+Jgg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgaSI-0002nY-AZ; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 20:57:46 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgaSB-0002ge-2M; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 20:57:40 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41A652067B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591217858; bh=SA51jkVVsXD1P0/zuGau7LRvGwUl3rZwCvD7U14lHT0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R+x3Nw9u+7nEi0n9itYHOzSOxlNljPSeK///Mzs4PX4z9nuno+Auj7Ou/r8TfYcQj uztZdVJR2O9plQuWNmfFkbrIVuKApSrGtnDYKJxw1kdVo7XgNWC760pouhfMKv0YAR x/btwctWzOGNMZ8iDeLFOfWGWVXq4qA+zZh+kfGg= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:57:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ira Weiny Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice Message-Id: <20200603135736.e7b5ded0082a81ae6d9067a0@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20200507150004.1423069-8-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200518184843.3029640-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200519165422.GA5838@roeck-us.net> <20200519184031.GB3356843@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200519194215.GA71941@roeck-us.net> <20200520051315.GA3660833@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200603_135739_146996_C6441382 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Helge Deller , x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Guenter Roeck , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Borislav Petkov , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for > > > sparc 32 bit... > > > > > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > > > > > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > > > > > > > That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches. > > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Is there another test I need to run? This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might have issues on various architectures. Can folks please provide an update on the testing status? _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03EFC433E1 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A43572074B for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="mdabyslv"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R+x3Nw9u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A43572074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Xip1yjzUtvlBh/qdCSSPs5vY1BHh2/oayUg9BI7mz0k=; b=mdabyslvCS2ngT S7G1zNZbpEeVPKYGjbVTtz9csXZ5nUNOh5hFmW7NCm/qPfp7BAk3UpgEewqB9RLa76TYkbY6PvO49 c1INLo6RagKriXt6P8trpHtdbJjHj6xvPv/fpVVnDN03jNaSGj8QQ+yM8dH/xVcm9ooeHgqJdRtJH k/BQ0839j1E+wnU1lFjNdoWQXMkzmYL6yMKABzGnuK1p+b4wvBbwGe/AzWjz4NWVT4rDPtQu3Wvbb PQU3sV6nk0x7giuJFe2HfBpbf1OtGG+RLJlBJvxUrTV2HWHHCJoxE6gN7ki/RDduTsdNizcRSR7pr Ts7Bt59qBMNu1rm89PDg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgaSE-0002hC-5Q; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 20:57:42 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jgaSB-0002ge-2M; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 20:57:40 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41A652067B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591217858; bh=SA51jkVVsXD1P0/zuGau7LRvGwUl3rZwCvD7U14lHT0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R+x3Nw9u+7nEi0n9itYHOzSOxlNljPSeK///Mzs4PX4z9nuno+Auj7Ou/r8TfYcQj uztZdVJR2O9plQuWNmfFkbrIVuKApSrGtnDYKJxw1kdVo7XgNWC760pouhfMKv0YAR x/btwctWzOGNMZ8iDeLFOfWGWVXq4qA+zZh+kfGg= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:57:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ira Weiny Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice Message-Id: <20200603135736.e7b5ded0082a81ae6d9067a0@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20200507150004.1423069-8-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200518184843.3029640-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200519165422.GA5838@roeck-us.net> <20200519184031.GB3356843@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200519194215.GA71941@roeck-us.net> <20200520051315.GA3660833@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200603_135739_146996_C6441382 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Helge Deller , x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Guenter Roeck , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Borislav Petkov , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for > > > sparc 32 bit... > > > > > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > > > > > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > > > > > > > That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches. > > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Is there another test I need to run? This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might have issues on various architectures. Can folks please provide an update on the testing status? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42FAC433E2 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B02A2074B for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R+x3Nw9u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6B02A2074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA67589E7B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19FA89DD8 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41A652067B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591217858; bh=SA51jkVVsXD1P0/zuGau7LRvGwUl3rZwCvD7U14lHT0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R+x3Nw9u+7nEi0n9itYHOzSOxlNljPSeK///Mzs4PX4z9nuno+Auj7Ou/r8TfYcQj uztZdVJR2O9plQuWNmfFkbrIVuKApSrGtnDYKJxw1kdVo7XgNWC760pouhfMKv0YAR x/btwctWzOGNMZ8iDeLFOfWGWVXq4qA+zZh+kfGg= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:57:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ira Weiny Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice Message-Id: <20200603135736.e7b5ded0082a81ae6d9067a0@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20200507150004.1423069-8-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200518184843.3029640-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200519165422.GA5838@roeck-us.net> <20200519184031.GB3356843@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200519194215.GA71941@roeck-us.net> <20200520051315.GA3660833@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Helge Deller , x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Guenter Roeck , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Borislav Petkov , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for > > > sparc 32 bit... > > > > > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > > > > > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > > > > > > > That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches. > > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Is there another test I need to run? This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might have issues on various architectures. Can folks please provide an update on the testing status? _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel