From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D0AC433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EBE20738 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727806AbgFDImJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 04:42:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56042 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726802AbgFDImJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 04:42:09 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 265C4C05BD1E; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 01:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [5.158.153.53] (helo=debian-buster-darwi.lab.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jglRV-0008RC-Pp; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:41:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 10:41:40 +0200 From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Sebastian A. Siewior" , Steven Rostedt , LKML , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , Jens Axboe , Vivek Goyal , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Sumit Semwal , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] seqlock: seqcount_t call sites bugfixes Message-ID: <20200604084139.GA1123871@debian-buster-darwi.lab.linutronix.de> References: <20200603144949.1122421-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de> <20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:28:41AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since patch #7 and #8 from the series: > > > > [PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de > > > > are now pending on the lockdep/x86 IRQ state tracking patch series: > > > > [PATCH 00/14] x86/entry: disallow #DB more and x86/entry lockdep/nmi > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529212728.795169701@infradead.org > > > > [PATCH v3 0/5] lockdep: Change IRQ state tracking to use per-cpu variables > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529213550.683440625@infradead.org > > > > This is a repost only of the seqcount_t call sites bugfixes that were on > > top of the seqlock patch series. > > > > These fixes are independent, and can thus be merged on their own. I'm > > reposting them now so they can at least hit -rc2 or -rc3. > > I'm confused on what I should do with patch 6 here for dma-buf. Looks like > just a good cleanup/prep work, so I'd queue it for linux-next and 5.9, but > sounds like you want this in earlier. Do you need this in 5.8-rc for some > work meant for 5.9? Will this go in through some topic branch directly? > Should I apply it? > > Patch itself lgtm, I'm just confused what I should do with it. > My apologies for the confusion. The cover letter is indeed misleading w.r.t. the dma-buf patch. It isn't a bugfix, so it shouldn't hit -rc. Since without this patch compiling the seqcount series will fail, it will be best to merge it through tip instead. So all I need for now is a reviewed-by tag :) I will forwoard it to the tip tree afterwards. Thanks, -- Ahmed S. Darwish Linutronix GmbH From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC70C433E1 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 07:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C642E207F7 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 07:19:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C642E207F7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712976E857; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 07:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAD6B6E2BC for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [5.158.153.53] (helo=debian-buster-darwi.lab.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jglRV-0008RC-Pp; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:41:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 10:41:40 +0200 From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] seqlock: seqcount_t call sites bugfixes Message-ID: <20200604084139.GA1123871@debian-buster-darwi.lab.linutronix.de> References: <20200603144949.1122421-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de> <20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1, SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:18:56 +0000 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jens Axboe , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , "Sebastian A. Siewior" , LKML , Steven Rostedt , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Eric Dumazet , Ingo Molnar , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jakub Kicinski , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , "David S. Miller" , Vivek Goyal , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:28:41AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since patch #7 and #8 from the series: > > > > [PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de > > > > are now pending on the lockdep/x86 IRQ state tracking patch series: > > > > [PATCH 00/14] x86/entry: disallow #DB more and x86/entry lockdep/nmi > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529212728.795169701@infradead.org > > > > [PATCH v3 0/5] lockdep: Change IRQ state tracking to use per-cpu variables > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529213550.683440625@infradead.org > > > > This is a repost only of the seqcount_t call sites bugfixes that were on > > top of the seqlock patch series. > > > > These fixes are independent, and can thus be merged on their own. I'm > > reposting them now so they can at least hit -rc2 or -rc3. > > I'm confused on what I should do with patch 6 here for dma-buf. Looks like > just a good cleanup/prep work, so I'd queue it for linux-next and 5.9, but > sounds like you want this in earlier. Do you need this in 5.8-rc for some > work meant for 5.9? Will this go in through some topic branch directly? > Should I apply it? > > Patch itself lgtm, I'm just confused what I should do with it. > My apologies for the confusion. The cover letter is indeed misleading w.r.t. the dma-buf patch. It isn't a bugfix, so it shouldn't hit -rc. Since without this patch compiling the seqcount series will fail, it will be best to merge it through tip instead. So all I need for now is a reviewed-by tag :) I will forwoard it to the tip tree afterwards. Thanks, -- Ahmed S. Darwish Linutronix GmbH _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel