All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: glider@google.com
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, vgoyal@redhat.com,
	linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	royyang@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: explicitly initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr()
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:57:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006040844.C50B47699@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200604084245.161480-1-glider@google.com>

On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:42:45AM +0200, glider@google.com wrote:
> Under certain circumstances (we found this out running Docker on a
> Clang-built kernel with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL) ovl_copy_xattr() may
> return uninitialized value of |error| from ovl_copy_xattr().
> It is then returned by ovl_create() to lookup_open(), which casts it to
> an invalid dentry pointer, that can be further read or written by the
> lookup_open() callers.
> 
> The uninitialized value is returned when all the xattr on the file
> are ovl_is_private_xattr(), which is actually a successful case,
> therefore we initialize |error| with 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Roy Yang <royyang@google.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.1

Please include a Fixes (more below) and Link tags for details to help
guide backporting, then you don't need to bother with with "# 4.1",
the -stable tools will figure it out with a "Fixes" tag.

Thanks for the v2!

Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1050405
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

> The bug seem to date back to at least v4.1 where the annotation has been
> introduced (i.e. the compilers started noticing error could be used
> before being initialized). I hovever didn't try to prove that the
> problem is actually reproducible on such ancient kernels. We've seen it
> on a real machine running v4.4 as well.

It seems like it came from this, but that's v4.5:

Fixes: e4ad29fa0d22 ("ovl: use a minimal buffer in ovl_copy_xattr")

What did you find in v4.1? It looks like error isn't uninitialized in
v4.1:

int ovl_copy_xattr(struct dentry *old, struct dentry *new)
{
        ssize_t list_size, size;
        char *buf, *name, *value;
        int error;

        if (!old->d_inode->i_op->getxattr ||
            !new->d_inode->i_op->getxattr)
                return 0;

        list_size = vfs_listxattr(old, NULL, 0);
        if (list_size <= 0) {
                if (list_size == -EOPNOTSUPP)
                        return 0;
                return list_size;
        }

        buf = kzalloc(list_size, GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!buf)
                return -ENOMEM;

        error = -ENOMEM;
...

But v4.1.52 backported the above patch (e4ad29fa0d22), which is why I
don't try to figure these things out manually. Once we find the commit,
the tools will figure it out. I think you just need:

Fixes: e4ad29fa0d22 ("ovl: use a minimal buffer in ovl_copy_xattr")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

and things like v4.1.52 will get fixed (if anyone is actually doing
updates for v4.1.z any more...)

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-04  8:42 [PATCH] ovl: explicitly initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr() glider
2020-06-04  8:57 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-06-04 16:00   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 15:57 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-05  9:46   ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-06-05  9:54   ` Miklos Szeredi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-03 17:47 glider
2020-06-03 20:35 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-03 21:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-06-04  8:28   ` Alexander Potapenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202006040844.C50B47699@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=royyang@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.