From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
x86@kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86/mm/numa: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:39:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006041539.B8C0C768@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh9i7bpi.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:39:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> >> > -#define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
> >> > +#define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS 1
> >>
> >> but if we ever lose the 1 then the above will silently compile the code
> >> within the IS_ENABLED() section out.
> >
> > That's true, yes. I considered two other ways to do this:
> >
> > 1) smallest patch, but more #ifdef:
> > 2) medium size, weird style:
> >
> > and 3 is what I sent: biggest, but removes #ifdef
> >
> > Any preference?
>
> From a readbility POV I surely prefer #3. i"m just wary. Add a big fat
> comment to the define might mitigate that, hmm?
Sure! I'll add it.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 23:31 [PATCH 00/10] Remove uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86/mm/numa: Remove uninitialized_var() usage Kees Cook
2020-06-04 7:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-04 11:41 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 11:41 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 14:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 15:22 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 15:22 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 14:34 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 21:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-04 22:39 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] drbd: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:56 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 19:56 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 03/10] b43: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:08 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:08 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:18 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:25 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:25 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-05 9:20 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-05 9:20 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 04/10] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-05 9:18 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-05 9:18 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 05/10] ide: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 19:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:20 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-15 19:32 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:58 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 20:58 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 06/10] clk: st: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 4:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 07/10] spi: davinci: " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 19:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 08/10] checkpatch: Remove awareness of uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-04 0:02 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-04 0:02 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-04 1:40 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 1:47 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-04 1:47 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-04 2:44 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 2:53 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 2:53 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 3:46 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 09/10] treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage Kees Cook
2020-06-04 3:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-04 4:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 10:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-06-04 11:33 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-04 13:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-06-04 14:59 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 17:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-06-04 19:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-04 19:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-05 9:25 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-05 9:25 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 10/10] compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-04 0:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-04 0:50 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 0:50 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 1:23 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 1:23 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 1:44 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 1:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 1:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 3:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-04 7:26 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 7:26 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 14:27 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202006041539.B8C0C768@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.