Re: [PATCH v7 07/13] hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology decoding functions

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Babu Moger (babu.moger@amd.com) wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 10:46 AM
> > To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
> > Cc: marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; pbonzini@redhat.com; rth@twiddle.net;
> > mst@redhat.com; imammedo@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/13] hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology decoding
> > functions
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:38:46AM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/3/20 10:31 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:22:10AM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 6:01 PM
> > > >>> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
> > > >>> Cc: marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; pbonzini@redhat.com;
> > rth@twiddle.net;
> > > >>> mst@redhat.com; imammedo@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/13] hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology decoding
> > > >>> functions
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:59:19PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>>>> From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 12:19 PM
> > > >>>>> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
> > > >>>>> Cc: marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; pbonzini@redhat.com;
> > rth@twiddle.net;
> > > >>>>> mst@redhat.com; imammedo@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > > >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/13] hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology
> > decoding
> > > >>>>> functions
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> It looks like this series breaks -device and CPU hotplug:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 05:53:34PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> > > >>>>>> These functions add support for building EPYC mode topology given
> > the
> > > >>> smp
> > > >>>>>> details like numa nodes, cores, threads and sockets.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> The new apic id decoding is mostly similar to current apic id decoding
> > > >>>>>> except that it adds a new field node_id when numa configured.
> > Removes
> > > >>> all
> > > >>>>>> the hardcoded values. Subsequent patches will use these functions to
> > build
> > > >>>>>> the topology.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Following functions are added.
> > > >>>>>> apicid_llc_width_epyc
> > > >>>>>> apicid_llc_offset_epyc
> > > >>>>>> apicid_pkg_offset_epyc
> > > >>>>>> apicid_from_topo_ids_epyc
> > > >>>>>> x86_topo_ids_from_idx_epyc
> > > >>>>>> x86_topo_ids_from_apicid_epyc
> > > >>>>>> x86_apicid_from_cpu_idx_epyc
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> The topology details are available in Processor Programming
> > Reference
> > > >>> (PPR)
> > > >>>>>> for AMD Family 17h Model 01h, Revision B1 Processors. The revision
> > > >>> guides
> > > >>>>> are
> > > >>>>>> available from the bugzilla Link below.
> > > >>>>>> Link:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > kernel.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D206537&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cbabu.m
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > oger%40amd.com%7C3487f40d37df4d59097d08d807190248%7C3dd8961fe488
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > 4e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637267151289763739&amp;sdata=wE0
> > > >>>>> ukXIVh0l5eNQWsv6VDE9UZEVJmisofaW192gcZAI%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> > > >>>>>> Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> > > >>>>>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > >>>>>> ---
> > > >>>>> [...]
> > > >>>>>>  typedef struct X86CPUTopoIDs {
> > > >>>>>>      unsigned pkg_id;
> > > >>>>>> +    unsigned node_id;
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> You have added a new field here.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>      unsigned die_id;
> > > >>>>>>      unsigned core_id;
> > > >>>>>>      unsigned smt_id;
> > > >>>>> [...]
> > > >>>>>> +static inline apic_id_t
> > > >>>>>> +x86_apicid_from_topo_ids_epyc(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info,
> > > >>>>>> +                              const X86CPUTopoIDs *topo_ids)
> > > >>>>>> +{
> > > >>>>>> +    return (topo_ids->pkg_id  << apicid_pkg_offset_epyc(topo_info)) |
> > > >>>>>> +           (topo_ids->node_id << apicid_node_offset_epyc(topo_info)) |
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> You are using the new field here.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +           (topo_ids->die_id  << apicid_die_offset(topo_info)) |
> > > >>>>>> +           (topo_ids->core_id << apicid_core_offset(topo_info)) |
> > > >>>>>> +           topo_ids->smt_id;
> > > >>>>>> +}
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> But you are not initializing node_id in one caller of
> > apicid_from_topo_ids():
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> static void pc_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > > >>>>>                             DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > > >>>>> {
> > > >>>>>     [...]
> > > >>>>>     X86CPUTopoIDs topo_ids;
> > > >>>>>     [...]
> > > >>>>>     if (cpu->apic_id == UNASSIGNED_APIC_ID) {
> > > >>>>>         [...]
> > > >>>>>         topo_ids.pkg_id = cpu->socket_id;
> > > >>>>>         topo_ids.die_id = cpu->die_id;
> > > >>>>>         topo_ids.core_id = cpu->core_id;
> > > >>>>>         topo_ids.smt_id = cpu->thread_id;
> > > >>>>>         cpu->apic_id = x86ms->apicid_from_topo_ids(&topo_info,
> > &topo_ids);
> > > >>>>>     }
> > > >>>>>     [...]
> > > >>>>> }
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Result: -device is broken when using -cpu EPYC:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>   $ qemu-system-x86_64 -machine q35,accel=kvm -smp
> > > >>>>> 1,maxcpus=2,cores=1,threads=1,sockets=2 -cpu EPYC -device EPYC-
> > x86_64-
> > > >>>>> cpu,core-id=0,socket-id=1,thread-id=0
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>   qemu-system-x86_64: -device EPYC-x86_64-cpu,core-id=0,socket-
> > > >>> id=1,thread-
> > > >>>>> id=0: Invalid CPU [socket: 21855, die: 0, core: 0, thread: 0] with APIC ID
> > > >>> 21855,
> > > >>>>> valid index range 0:1
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> This happens because APIC ID is calculated using uninitialized
> > > >>>>> memory.
> > > >>>> This patch should initialize the node_id. But I am not sure how to
> > > >>>> reproduce the bug. Can you please send me the full command line to
> > > >>>> reproduce the problem. Also test different options.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The full command line is above[1].
> > > >>
> > > >> I just picked up the latest tree from
> > > >> git clone
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.qem
> > u.org%2Fgit%2Fqemu.git&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cbabu.moger%40amd.com%7
> > C4b409b77ff2c4c4ed90608d807d53570%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e1
> > 83d%7C0%7C0%7C637267959601716206&amp;sdata=ih6bo9Wp0RbJgRpryzSa2
> > D0v6kr3Zfww%2B1uB%2FNyngk8%3D&amp;reserved=0 qemu
> > > >> Not seeing the problem.
> > > >>
> > > >> ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -machine q35,accel=kvm -smp
> > > >> 1,maxcpus=2,cores=1,threads=1,sockets=2 -cpu EPYC -device
> > > >> EPYC-x86_64-cpu,core-id=0,socket-id=1,thread-id=0
> > > >> VNC server running on ::1:5900
> > > >>
> > > >> It appears to run ok.
> > >
> > > [2]
> > >
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > >>>> index 2128f3d6fe..047b4b9391 100644
> > > >>>> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > >>>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > >>>> @@ -1539,6 +1539,9 @@ static void pc_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler
> > > >>> *hotplug_dev,
> > > >>>>      if (cpu->apic_id == UNASSIGNED_APIC_ID) {
> > > >>>>          int max_socket = (ms->smp.max_cpus - 1) /
> > > >>>>                                  smp_threads / smp_cores / x86ms->smp_dies;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So, here's the input you are using to calculate topo_ids.node_id:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +        unsigned nr_nodes = MAX(topo_info.nodes_per_pkg, 1);
> > > >>>
> > > >>> When is topo_info.nodes_per_pkg allowed to be 0?
> > > >>
> > > >> It will be zero if numa is not configured. Node_id will be zero for all
> > > >> the cores.
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +        unsigned cores_per_node = DIV_ROUND_UP((x86ms->smp_dies *
> > > >>> smp_cores *
> > > >>>> +                                                smp_threads), nr_nodes);
> > > >>>
> > > >>> x86ms->smp_dies should be available at topo_info.dies_per_pkg,
> > > >>> smp_cores should available at topo_info.cores_per_die,
> > > >>> smp_threads should be available at topo_info.threads_per_core,
> > > >>> nr_nodes should be available at topo_info.nodes_per_pkg.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>          /*
> > > >>>>           * die-id was optional in QEMU 4.0 and older, so keep it optional
> > > >>>> @@ -1585,6 +1588,7 @@ static void pc_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler
> > > >>> *hotplug_dev,
> > > >>>>          topo_ids.die_id = cpu->die_id;
> > > >>>>          topo_ids.core_id = cpu->core_id;
> > > >>>>          topo_ids.smt_id = cpu->thread_id;
> > > >>>> +        topo_ids.node_id = (cpu->core_id / cores_per_node) % nr_nodes;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> apicid_from_topo_ids() have access to topo_info and topo_ids, If
> > > >>> all the information you need to calculate node_id is already
> > > >>> available inside topo_info + topo_ids, we could be calculating it
> > > >>> inside apicid_from_topo_ids().  Why don't we do it?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also, is topo_ids.core_id really allowed to be larger than
> > > >>> cores_per_node when calling apicid_from_topo_ids()?
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes. It is. If we have two numa nodes and 8 cores. Then cores_per_node is
> > > >> 4. Nr_nodes =2. Yes. Core_id can be larger than cores_per_node.
> > > >
> > > > I assumed core_id identified the core inside a die, and the range
> > > > would be [0, cores_per_die).  This seems to be what
> > > > apicid_from_topo_ids_epyc() expects.
> > > >
> > > > We need clearer documentation on the semantics of each *_id
> > > > field, to avoid confusion.
> > >
> > > Ok. Sure. I will add that. Can you please clarify on how to repro the
> > > issue. Marked the question at [2].
> > 
> > As it is usage of uninitialized memory, behavior is undefined and
> > not guaranteed to crash.  My QEMU binary was built with
> > --enable-debug, maybe it makes it easier to reproduce.
> 
> This patch works fine. Tested few combination. Will send the formal
> version if patch looks good.
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/topology.h b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> index 07239f95f4..cb28f0a57c 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
> @@ -140,6 +140,17 @@ static inline unsigned
> apicid_pkg_offset_epyc(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info)
>             apicid_node_width_epyc(topo_info);
>  }
> 
> +static inline unsigned x86_node_id_for_epyc(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info,
> +                                            const X86CPUTopoIDs *topo_ids)
> +{
> +    unsigned nr_nodes = MAX(topo_info->nodes_per_pkg, 1);
> +    unsigned cores_per_node = DIV_ROUND_UP((topo_info->dies_per_pkg *
> +                                            topo_info->cores_per_die *
> +                                            topo_info->threads_per_core),
> +                                            nr_nodes);
> +
> +    return ((topo_ids->core_id / cores_per_node) % nr_nodes);
> +}
>  /*
>   * Make APIC ID for the CPU based on Pkg_ID, Core_ID, SMT_ID
>   *
> @@ -149,8 +160,11 @@ static inline apic_id_t
>  x86_apicid_from_topo_ids_epyc(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info,
>                                const X86CPUTopoIDs *topo_ids)
>  {
> +    /* node_id can be uninitialized. Initialize here */
> +    unsigned node_id = x86_node_id_for_epyc(topo_info, topo_ids);
> +
>      return (topo_ids->pkg_id  << apicid_pkg_offset_epyc(topo_info)) |
> -           (topo_ids->node_id << apicid_node_offset_epyc(topo_info)) |
> +           (node_id << apicid_node_offset_epyc(topo_info)) |
>             (topo_ids->die_id  << apicid_die_offset(topo_info)) |
>             (topo_ids->core_id << apicid_core_offset(topo_info)) |
>             topo_ids->smt_id;
> 

What's the status of this?  It seems to fix a hotplug case our QE hit
(RH bz 1828750)

Dave

--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK