All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Paul Durrant" <paul@xen.org>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID serialisation is sorted
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:15:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200615141532.1927-3-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615141532.1927-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

The existing x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer() does produce sorted results, and we're
about to start relying on this.  Extend the unit tests.

As test_cpuid_serialise_success() is a fairly limited set of synthetic
examples right now, introduce test_cpuid_current() to operate on the full
policy for the current CPU.

Tweak the fail() macro to allow for simplified control flow.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
CC: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
---
 tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
index fe8cdf6ea9..7ba9707236 100644
--- a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
+++ b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static unsigned int nr_failures;
 #define fail(fmt, ...)                          \
 ({                                              \
     nr_failures++;                              \
-    printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);                 \
+    (void)printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);           \
 })
 
 #define memdup(ptr)                             \
@@ -66,6 +66,45 @@ static void test_vendor_identification(void)
     }
 }
 
+static bool leaves_are_sorted(const xen_cpuid_leaf_t *leaves, unsigned int nr)
+{
+    for ( unsigned int i = 1; i < nr; ++i )
+    {
+        /* leaf index went backwards => not sorted. */
+        if ( leaves[i - 1].leaf > leaves[i].leaf )
+            return false;
+
+        /* leaf index went forwards => ok */
+        if ( leaves[i - 1].leaf < leaves[i].leaf )
+            continue;
+
+        /* leave index the same, subleaf didn't increase => not sorted. */
+        if ( leaves[i - 1].subleaf >= leaves[i].subleaf )
+            return false;
+    }
+
+    return true;
+}
+
+static void test_cpuid_current(void)
+{
+    struct cpuid_policy p;
+    xen_cpuid_leaf_t leaves[CPUID_MAX_SERIALISED_LEAVES];
+    unsigned int nr = ARRAY_SIZE(leaves);
+    int rc;
+
+    printf("Testing CPUID on current CPU\n");
+
+    x86_cpuid_policy_fill_native(&p);
+
+    rc = x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer(&p, leaves, &nr);
+    if ( rc != 0 )
+        return fail("  Serialise, expected rc 0, got %d\n", rc);
+
+    if ( !leaves_are_sorted(leaves, nr) )
+        return fail("  Leaves not sorted\n");
+}
+
 static void test_cpuid_serialise_success(void)
 {
     static const struct test {
@@ -178,6 +217,13 @@ static void test_cpuid_serialise_success(void)
             goto test_done;
         }
 
+        if ( !leaves_are_sorted(leaves, nr) )
+        {
+            fail("  Test %s, leaves not sorted\n",
+                 t->name);
+            goto test_done;
+        }
+
     test_done:
         free(leaves);
     }
@@ -613,6 +659,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
     test_vendor_identification();
 
+    test_cpuid_current();
     test_cpuid_serialise_success();
     test_cpuid_deserialise_failure();
     test_cpuid_out_of_range_clearing();
-- 
2.11.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-15 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-15 14:15 [PATCH for-4.14 0/9] XSA-320 follow for IvyBridge Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] tools/libx[cl]: Introduce struct xc_xend_cpuid for xc_cpuid_set() Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:51   ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2020-06-15 14:52   ` [PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID serialisation is sorted Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 15:00     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 15:34       ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 16:12         ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-16  6:51           ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16  9:01   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] tools/libx[cl]: Move processing loop down into xc_cpuid_set() Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:54   ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-16  9:16   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16 15:58     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] tools/libx[cl]: Merge xc_cpuid_set() into xc_cpuid_apply_policy() Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:55   ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] tools/libx[cl]: Plumb bool restore down " Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:55   ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/gen-cpuid: Distinguish default vs max in feature annotations Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/hvm: Disable MPX by default Andrew Cooper
2020-06-16  9:33   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16 16:15     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-17 10:32       ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-17 11:16         ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-17 11:24           ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-17 11:28             ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-17 11:41               ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-17 11:47                 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/cpuid: Introduce missing feature adjustment in calculate_pv_def_policy() Andrew Cooper
2020-06-16  9:40   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16 16:17     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/spec-ctrl: Hide RDRAND by default on IvyBridge Andrew Cooper
2020-06-16 10:00   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16 16:26     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-17 10:39       ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-17 11:21         ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 17:04 ` [PATCH for-4.14 0/9] XSA-320 follow for IvyBridge Paul Durrant
2020-06-17 12:46   ` Paul Durrant
2020-06-18  7:18 ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-18  9:37   ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200615141532.1927-3-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.