From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE91C433DF for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A657C207E8 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:53:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593096836; bh=NAJKRYY0MQ7KEvPqGjaP5V5F1etD3ZR4WhDtnXRMksQ=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID: From; b=AA+iB/QIjsxRkicmP0pJJFHpNf0261Y+k8bctUY2FmRkUCEpywhwyAQkxVGOpT412 VbDKBB7tzWcsGp7Tcmg1mf3kfJlcIiQ9lAyAMCtdxZXiLsMNrJt0dG1fTJuC/ZePTf QiK02uFxFhY/sfi4kT5NJJcAHOYQ3bfSy0TEUqgo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405405AbgFYOx4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:53:56 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49908 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405309AbgFYOx4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:53:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [137.135.114.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E5BB20768; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:53:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593096835; bh=NAJKRYY0MQ7KEvPqGjaP5V5F1etD3ZR4WhDtnXRMksQ=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZULTOdOw+lIwfbzK99GntpkE+tDiLi6hnWU/FDiQHfOIe/jK+gtqANufcN+QgdWqH HkNfPXV/nUuMyJ3BXgqhc/avma24QtsoN13cX/sXGpWl/h2ItWxOyW/VFm0gLD+os4 iHboANvJx8WzzBlBLARbVwUeMltrmvnSkM0cMHfI= Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:53:54 +0000 From: Sasha Levin To: Sasha Levin To: Finley Xiao To: xf@rock-chips.com Cc: Finley Xiao Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] thermal/drivers/cpufreq_cooling: Fix wrong frequency converted from power In-Reply-To: <20200623114206.13762-1-finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> References: <20200623114206.13762-1-finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> Message-Id: <20200625145355.3E5BB20768@mail.kernel.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag fixing commit: 349d39dc5739 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tables"). The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v4.19.129, v4.14.185. v5.7.5: Build OK! v5.4.48: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 5a4e5b78956a5 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Make the power-related code depend on IPA") a4e893e802e6a ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Migrate to using the EM framework") v4.19.129: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 18c49926c4bf4 ("cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints") 2acb9bdae92d0 ("cpufreq: Explain the kobject_put() in cpufreq_policy_alloc()") 2d8b39a62a5d3 ("ACPI: processor: Avoid NULL pointer dereferences at init time") 3000ce3c52f8b ("cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS") 348a2ec5f5a5a ("cpufreq: Reorder and simplify cpufreq_update_policy()") 4ebe36c94aed9 ("cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak") 540a375822a40 ("cpufreq: Add cpufreq_cpu_acquire() and cpufreq_cpu_release()") 5a4e5b78956a5 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Make the power-related code depend on IPA") 5c238a8b599f1 ("cpufreq: Auto-register the driver as a thermal cooling device if asked") 67d874c3b2c69 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework") 70a59fde6e69d ("cpufreq: Avoid calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() from handle_update()") a0dbb819b84f8 ("cpufreq: Add kerneldoc comments for two core functions") a4e893e802e6a ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Migrate to using the EM framework") d15ce412737ac ("ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier") v4.14.185: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 18c49926c4bf4 ("cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints") 2acb9bdae92d0 ("cpufreq: Explain the kobject_put() in cpufreq_policy_alloc()") 2d8b39a62a5d3 ("ACPI: processor: Avoid NULL pointer dereferences at init time") 3000ce3c52f8b ("cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS") 348a2ec5f5a5a ("cpufreq: Reorder and simplify cpufreq_update_policy()") 4ebe36c94aed9 ("cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak") 540a375822a40 ("cpufreq: Add cpufreq_cpu_acquire() and cpufreq_cpu_release()") 5a4e5b78956a5 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Make the power-related code depend on IPA") 5c238a8b599f1 ("cpufreq: Auto-register the driver as a thermal cooling device if asked") 67d874c3b2c69 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework") 70a59fde6e69d ("cpufreq: Avoid calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() from handle_update()") a0dbb819b84f8 ("cpufreq: Add kerneldoc comments for two core functions") a4e893e802e6a ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Migrate to using the EM framework") d15ce412737ac ("ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks Sasha