On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:53:54PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 6/25/20 2:15 PM, Lijun Pan wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> On Jun 25, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/25/20 10:00 AM, Lijun Pan wrote:
> >>> +#define VDIV_MOD_DO(name, op, element, sign, bit)                       \
> >>> +    void helper_v##name(ppc_avr_t *r, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b)       \
> >>> +    {                                                                   \
> >>> +        int i;                                                          \
> >>> +                                                                        \
> >>> +                                                                        \
> >>> +        for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(r->element); i++) {                  \
> >>> +            if (unlikely((b->element[i] == 0) ||                        \
> >>> +                (sign &&                                                \
> >>> +                (b->element[i] == UINT##bit##_MAX) &&                   \
> >>> +                (a->element[i] == INT##bit##_MIN))))                    \
> >>> +                continue;                                               \
> >>> +            r->element[i] = a->element[i] op b->element[i];             \
> >>> +        }                                                               \
> >>> +    }
> >>
> >> Missing braces for the if.  Extra blank line before the for.
> > 
> > No, the braces are enough.
> 
> No they are not.  See CODING_STYLE.rst.

I suspect there is some confusion in terms here.

Lijun, what Richard is saying is that the qemu coding style requires
braces { } around if blocks, even if they're a single statement.  Your
response seemed to be discussing the brackets ( ) which are fine.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson