All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	ast@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
	jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
	ravenexp@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com,
	slyfox@gentoo.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:50:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626115040.GN13911@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626114008.GK4332@42.do-not-panic.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:40:08AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Andrew, can you please revert these two for now:
> 
> selftests: simplify kmod failure value
> umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used
> 
> Later, we'll add Christoph's simplier kernel wait, and make the change
> directly there to catpure the right error. That still won't fix this reported
> issue, but it will be cleaner and will go tested by Christian Borntraeger
> before.

However, note that the only consideration to make here against this
approach of the fix later going in with the simpler kernel wait is
if this actually is fixing a real issue, and if we'd want this going to
stable.

We should for sure revert though, so Andrew please do proceed to revert
or drop those two patches alone for now.

It was unclear to me if this should go to stable given I was not sure
how severe that NFS case mentioned on the commit log was, and no one on
the NFS side has replied about that yet, however there may be other
areas where code inspection of callsites was not sufficient to find the
real critical areas.

I'm now very curious what this issue that Christian with bridge on s390
found will be.

  Luis

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	ast@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
	jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
	ravenexp@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com,
	slyfox@gentoo.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:50:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626115040.GN13911@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626114008.GK4332@42.do-not-panic.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:40:08AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Andrew, can you please revert these two for now:
> 
> selftests: simplify kmod failure value
> umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used
> 
> Later, we'll add Christoph's simplier kernel wait, and make the change
> directly there to catpure the right error. That still won't fix this reported
> issue, but it will be cleaner and will go tested by Christian Borntraeger
> before.

However, note that the only consideration to make here against this
approach of the fix later going in with the simpler kernel wait is
if this actually is fixing a real issue, and if we'd want this going to
stable.

We should for sure revert though, so Andrew please do proceed to revert
or drop those two patches alone for now.

It was unclear to me if this should go to stable given I was not sure
how severe that NFS case mentioned on the commit log was, and no one on
the NFS side has replied about that yet, however there may be other
areas where code inspection of callsites was not sufficient to find the
real critical areas.

I'm now very curious what this issue that Christian with bridge on s390
found will be.

  Luis

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
	philipp.reisner@linbit.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
	yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	kuba@kernel.org, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, slyfox@gentoo.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	ravenexp@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:50:44 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200626115040.GN13911@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626114008.GK4332@42.do-not-panic.com>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:40:08AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Andrew, can you please revert these two for now:
> 
> selftests: simplify kmod failure value
> umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used
> 
> Later, we'll add Christoph's simplier kernel wait, and make the change
> directly there to catpure the right error. That still won't fix this reported
> issue, but it will be cleaner and will go tested by Christian Borntraeger
> before.

However, note that the only consideration to make here against this
approach of the fix later going in with the simpler kernel wait is
if this actually is fixing a real issue, and if we'd want this going to
stable.

We should for sure revert though, so Andrew please do proceed to revert
or drop those two patches alone for now.

It was unclear to me if this should go to stable given I was not sure
how severe that NFS case mentioned on the commit log was, and no one on
the NFS side has replied about that yet, however there may be other
areas where code inspection of callsites was not sufficient to find the
real critical areas.

I'm now very curious what this issue that Christian with bridge on s390
found will be.

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-26 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 15:49 [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests: kmod: Use variable NAME in kmod_test_0001() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] test_kmod: Avoid potential double free in trigger_config_run_type() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-23 14:11   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:12     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:11     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 15:09       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:12         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 12:05         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 14:43         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 15:54           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:56             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:54             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 16:09             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 17:58               ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:59                 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:58                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:10                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:38                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:27                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26                         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  2:54                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  2:54                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  2:54                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  5:22                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  5:24                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  5:22                           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  9:00                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26  9:00                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26  9:00                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 11:40                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40                               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                               ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2020-06-26 11:50                                 ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 10:08                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08                             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:24                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:53                               ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53                                 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 14:08                                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08                                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 15:38                                   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:39                                     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:38                                     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:48                                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:49                                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:48                                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:58                                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58                                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58                                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 16:01                                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:03                                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:01                                           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-02  4:26                                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02  4:26                                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02  4:26                                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 19:46                                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:47                                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:46                                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03  0:52                                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03  0:52                                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03  0:52                                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 13:28                                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28                                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28                                             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:26                                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:27                                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:26                                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:46                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46                               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-18  0:43 ` [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Andrew Morton
2020-06-18  0:43   ` [Bridge] " Andrew Morton
2020-06-18  0:43   ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-19 20:46   ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46     ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07       ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200626115040.GN13911@42.do-not-panic.com \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markward@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    --cc=ravenexp@gmail.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.