From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1A6C433DF for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88CB32078D for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:51:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 88CB32078D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jomsj-0002im-RK; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:50:57 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jomsj-0002if-4M for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:50:57 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 4b556abc-b7a3-11ea-bb8b-bc764e2007e4 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (unknown [209.85.128.65]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 4b556abc-b7a3-11ea-bb8b-bc764e2007e4; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id a6so8726694wmm.0 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:50:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4NJZpymAfpFAgCWr9gUb+oM6L0GUKtNoFK72YNX8rV0=; b=RXke+fAmjc/dfZ3jYsRG9U8NrFELQlUZ1rGNjSlXFNRTDBTfNMqt+iYmz9H634Mjms TVJH6rAkGKGucZWveqQvRaYAJIY49mZmhsdVR7/egQxpTusuY6v+H13DNLHPdHvUVa1l jT2fWelmM7MBbKKj3HYsYKjObEbtJmGVP80P3lTKLs/+8jiPg1jOmZKdV/fkLsnvnmjI CLwXU/m4j+8ocyW4xvWRb0HuKVq5C4ZDKg52XDozNjSyCw1JIk5cjA6SLxLgNe+f9BqV hFf9sssVYDmFin6okvwY8YN0tEIlI1h0Sboq8CnYzuMeoI9DO6foK1kHYuTZsdao6Iue xbdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/afCx38MF7SJ8ZMxLw3WCVnKKxH7diJcmcC7H+A+vZ5b6ud0L +QYjSzDUa12TtGOFBOtMkxY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzb8L2eVl5EThx2cNUh/2m0xjSUjkf7/Csj4TO0qsGKms60PqrjJyKoxgd4Gtu3DBiEcnBEZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c3c5:: with SMTP id t188mr3161863wmf.53.1593172255660; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liuwe-devbox-debian-v2 ([51.145.34.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z16sm26598818wrr.35.2020.06.26.04.50.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:50:53 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Leszczy=C5=84ski?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] tools/libxc: add xc_vmtrace_* functions Message-ID: <20200626115053.aaugxnmb5wgh7wb4@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2> References: <1617453791.11443328.1592849168658.JavaMail.zimbra@cert.pl> <1478140470.11443872.1592849522947.JavaMail.zimbra@cert.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1478140470.11443872.1592849522947.JavaMail.zimbra@cert.pl> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Tamas K Lengyel , Ian Jackson , "Kang, Luwei" , Wei Liu Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 08:12:02PM +0200, Michał Leszczyński wrote: > Add functions in libxc that use the new HVMOP_vmtrace interface. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Leszczynski They look to be simple wrappers for hypercalls, so their acceptance will be dependent on the hypervisor side code. Wei.