All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	mgorman@suse.de, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Better document ttwu()
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:36:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703113603.GL117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200703083012.GU4800@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 10:30:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > > @@ -3134,8 +3274,12 @@ static inline void prepare_task(struct task_struct *next)
> > >       /*
> > >        * Claim the task as running, we do this before switching to it
> > >        * such that any running task will have this set.
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * __schedule()'s rq->lock and smp_mb__after_spin_lock() orders this
> > > +	 * store against prior state change of @next, also see
> > > +	 * try_to_wake_up(), specifically smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu).
> > 
> > smp_*cond*_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, <blah>)
> 
> Both, but yeah.. arguably the cond one is the more important one.

Ah no, this one really want to match the WF_ON_CPU case. I'll clarify
non-the-less.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-02 12:52 [RFC][PATCH] sched: Better document ttwu() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-02 13:13 ` Phil Auld
2020-07-02 15:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-02 18:39 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-07-03  8:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 11:36     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-07-03 10:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-07-03 12:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-07-22  9:12 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200703113603.GL117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.