From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E37C433E0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA8C2077D for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Gt6crJkw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727097AbgGJMM5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:12:57 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:28725 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726664AbgGJMM5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:12:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594383175; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m8g5K4VLg4BTneoyfPTMeQatQmDnDh/9EQUZe3BPx8E=; b=Gt6crJkwrnFfJ5q9etrC5hxZT7c/TN15B1uz2b1H2sijEcTXt3UwlNQIVgl4BIKrAsHo7c R3isRYtiZpCdO/i3SJv3+E9owJM4aU6FvXeAV6lziFYLg6OE7X99QtqJavyQZySzZFxpaX DLxK7GzbazEjJFUwYGvIg0xXrOuMwd0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-394-L0O2jgtJMHOaw7DzDpvHNQ-1; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:12:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: L0O2jgtJMHOaw7DzDpvHNQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBC0B102C7F1; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from steredhat.redhat.com (ovpn-112-4.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E0A5C6C0; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:12:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefano Garzarella To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: Stefano Garzarella , Stefan Hajnoczi , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski , kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] vsock/virtio: annotate 'the_virtio_vsock' RCU pointer Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:12:43 +0200 Message-Id: <20200710121243.120096-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit 0deab087b16a ("vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock") starts to use RCU to protect 'the_virtio_vsock' pointer, but we forgot to annotate it. This patch adds the annotation to fix the following sparse errors: net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:73:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:73:17: struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:73:17: struct virtio_vsock * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:171:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:171:17: struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:171:17: struct virtio_vsock * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:207:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:207:17: struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:207:17: struct virtio_vsock * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:561:13: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:561:13: struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:561:13: struct virtio_vsock * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:612:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:612:9: struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:612:9: struct virtio_vsock * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:631:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:631:9: struct virtio_vsock [noderef] __rcu * net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:631:9: struct virtio_vsock * Fixes: 0deab087b16a ("vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock") Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella --- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c index dfbaf6bd8b1c..2700a63ab095 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #include static struct workqueue_struct *virtio_vsock_workqueue; -static struct virtio_vsock *the_virtio_vsock; +static struct virtio_vsock __rcu *the_virtio_vsock; static DEFINE_MUTEX(the_virtio_vsock_mutex); /* protects the_virtio_vsock */ struct virtio_vsock { -- 2.26.2