From: Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [WIP PATCH] io_uring: Support opening a file into the fixed-file table
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 21:32:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715023240.r6wyekihzc2jadpm@ps29521.dreamhostps.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200714225905.jqlvdvxx564rykxu@ps29521.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, Jul 14 2020 at 17:59:05 -0500, Clay Harris quoth thus:
> On Tue, Jul 14 2020 at 14:08:26 -0700, Josh Triplett quoth thus:
>
> > The other next step would be to add an IORING_OP_CLOSE_FIXED_FILE
> > (separate from the existing CLOSE op) that removes an entry currently in
> > the fixed file table and calls fput on it. (With some care, that
> > *should* be possible even for an entry that was originally registered
> > from a file descriptor.)
I'm curious why you wouldn't use IOSQE_FIXED_FILE here. I understand
your reasoning for OPEN_FIXED_FILE, but using the flag with the existing
CLOSE OP seems like a perfect fit. To me, this looks like a suboptimal
precedent that would result in defining a new opcode for every request
which could accept either a fixed file or process descriptor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 21:08 [WIP PATCH] io_uring: Support opening a file into the fixed-file table Josh Triplett
2020-07-14 21:16 ` [WIP PATCH] liburing: Support IORING_OP_OPENAT2_FIXED_FILE Josh Triplett
2020-07-14 22:59 ` [WIP PATCH] io_uring: Support opening a file into the fixed-file table Clay Harris
2020-07-15 0:42 ` Josh Triplett
2020-07-15 2:32 ` Clay Harris [this message]
2020-07-15 21:04 ` josh
2020-07-15 16:07 ` Jens Axboe
2020-07-15 19:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-15 20:46 ` Josh Triplett
2020-07-15 20:54 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200715023240.r6wyekihzc2jadpm@ps29521.dreamhostps.com \
--to=bugs@claycon.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.