All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/66] drm/i915: Export a preallocate variant of i915_active_acquire()
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:50:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715115147.11866-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715115147.11866-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Sometimes we have to be very careful not to allocate underneath a mutex
(or spinlock) and yet still want to track activity. Enter
i915_active_acquire_for_context(). This raises the activity counter on
i915_active prior to use and ensures that the fence-tree contains a slot
for the context.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c    |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c      |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c            | 136 +++++++++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h            |  12 +-
 4 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 6b4ec66cb558..719ba9fe3e85 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ __parser_mark_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
 {
 	struct intel_gt_buffer_pool_node *node = vma->private;
 
-	return i915_active_ref(&node->active, tl, fence);
+	return i915_active_ref(&node->active, tl->fence_context, fence);
 }
 
 static int
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c
index 46d20f5f3ddc..acb43aebd669 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c
@@ -484,7 +484,9 @@ __intel_timeline_get_seqno(struct intel_timeline *tl,
 	 * free it after the current request is retired, which ensures that
 	 * all writes into the cacheline from previous requests are complete.
 	 */
-	err = i915_active_ref(&tl->hwsp_cacheline->active, tl, &rq->fence);
+	err = i915_active_ref(&tl->hwsp_cacheline->active,
+			      tl->fence_context,
+			      &rq->fence);
 	if (err)
 		goto err_cacheline;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index 841b5c30950a..799282fb1bb9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ static struct i915_global_active {
 } global;
 
 struct active_node {
+	struct rb_node node;
 	struct i915_active_fence base;
 	struct i915_active *ref;
-	struct rb_node node;
 	u64 timeline;
 };
 
+#define fetch_node(x) rb_entry(READ_ONCE(x), typeof(struct active_node), node)
+
 static inline struct active_node *
 node_from_active(struct i915_active_fence *active)
 {
@@ -216,12 +218,40 @@ excl_retire(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
 		active_retire(container_of(cb, struct i915_active, excl.cb));
 }
 
+static struct active_node *__active_lookup(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
+{
+	struct active_node *it;
+
+	it = READ_ONCE(ref->cache);
+	if (it && it->timeline == idx)
+		return it;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*it), node));
+
+	/* While active, the tree can only be built; not destroyed */
+	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref));
+
+	it = fetch_node(ref->tree.rb_node);
+	while (it) {
+		if (it->timeline < idx) {
+			it = fetch_node(it->node.rb_right);
+		} else if (it->timeline > idx) {
+			it = fetch_node(it->node.rb_left);
+		} else {
+			WRITE_ONCE(ref->cache, it);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* NB: If the tree rotated beneath us, we may miss our target. */
+	return it;
+}
+
 static struct i915_active_fence *
-active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, struct intel_timeline *tl)
+active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
 {
 	struct active_node *node, *prealloc;
 	struct rb_node **p, *parent;
-	u64 idx = tl->fence_context;
 
 	/*
 	 * We track the most recently used timeline to skip a rbtree search
@@ -230,8 +260,8 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, struct intel_timeline *tl)
 	 * after the previous activity has been retired, or if it matches the
 	 * current timeline.
 	 */
-	node = READ_ONCE(ref->cache);
-	if (node && node->timeline == idx)
+	node = __active_lookup(ref, idx);
+	if (likely(node))
 		return &node->base;
 
 	/* Preallocate a replacement, just in case */
@@ -268,10 +298,9 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, struct intel_timeline *tl)
 	rb_insert_color(&node->node, &ref->tree);
 
 out:
-	ref->cache = node;
+	WRITE_ONCE(ref->cache, node);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*node), base));
 	return &node->base;
 }
 
@@ -353,21 +382,17 @@ __active_del_barrier(struct i915_active *ref, struct active_node *node)
 	return ____active_del_barrier(ref, node, barrier_to_engine(node));
 }
 
-int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
-		    struct intel_timeline *tl,
-		    struct dma_fence *fence)
+int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence)
 {
 	struct i915_active_fence *active;
 	int err;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&tl->mutex);
-
 	/* Prevent reaping in case we malloc/wait while building the tree */
 	err = i915_active_acquire(ref);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	active = active_instance(ref, tl);
+	active = active_instance(ref, idx);
 	if (!active) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
@@ -384,32 +409,81 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
 		atomic_dec(&ref->count);
 	}
 	if (!__i915_active_fence_set(active, fence))
-		atomic_inc(&ref->count);
+		__i915_active_acquire(ref);
 
 out:
 	i915_active_release(ref);
 	return err;
 }
 
-struct dma_fence *
-i915_active_set_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref, struct dma_fence *f)
+static struct dma_fence *
+__i915_active_set_fence(struct i915_active *ref,
+			struct i915_active_fence *active,
+			struct dma_fence *fence)
 {
 	struct dma_fence *prev;
 
-	/* We expect the caller to manage the exclusive timeline ordering */
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref));
+	if (is_barrier(active)) { /* proto-node used by our idle barrier */
+		/*
+		 * This request is on the kernel_context timeline, and so
+		 * we can use it to substitute for the pending idle-barrer
+		 * request that we want to emit on the kernel_context.
+		 */
+		__active_del_barrier(ref, node_from_active(active));
+		RCU_INIT_POINTER(active->fence, fence);
+		return NULL;
+	}
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	prev = __i915_active_fence_set(&ref->excl, f);
+	prev = __i915_active_fence_set(active, fence);
 	if (prev)
 		prev = dma_fence_get_rcu(prev);
 	else
-		atomic_inc(&ref->count);
+		__i915_active_acquire(ref);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return prev;
 }
 
+static struct i915_active_fence *__active_fence(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
+{
+	struct active_node *it;
+
+	it = __active_lookup(ref, idx);
+	if (unlikely(!it)) { /* Contention with parallel tree builders! */
+		spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
+		it = fetch_node(ref->tree.rb_node);
+		while (it) {
+			if (it->timeline < idx) {
+				it = fetch_node(it->node.rb_right);
+			} else if (it->timeline > idx) {
+				it = fetch_node(it->node.rb_left);
+			} else {
+				WRITE_ONCE(ref->cache, it);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
+	}
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!it); /* slot must be preallocated */
+
+	return &it->base;
+}
+
+struct dma_fence *
+__i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+	/* Only valid while active, see i915_active_acquire_for_context() */
+	return __i915_active_set_fence(ref, __active_fence(ref, idx), fence);
+}
+
+struct dma_fence *
+i915_active_set_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref, struct dma_fence *f)
+{
+	/* We expect the caller to manage the exclusive timeline ordering */
+	return __i915_active_set_fence(ref, &ref->excl, f);
+}
+
 bool i915_active_acquire_if_busy(struct i915_active *ref)
 {
 	debug_active_assert(ref);
@@ -450,6 +524,24 @@ int i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref)
 	return err;
 }
 
+int i915_active_acquire_for_context(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
+{
+	struct i915_active_fence *active;
+	int err;
+
+	err = i915_active_acquire(ref);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	active = active_instance(ref, idx);
+	if (!active) {
+		i915_active_release(ref);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0; /* return with active ref */
+}
+
 void i915_active_release(struct i915_active *ref)
 {
 	debug_active_assert(ref);
@@ -753,7 +845,7 @@ static struct active_node *reuse_idle_barrier(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
 match:
 	rb_erase(p, &ref->tree); /* Hide from waits and sibling allocations */
 	if (p == &ref->cache->node)
-		ref->cache = NULL;
+		WRITE_ONCE(ref->cache, NULL);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
 
 	return rb_entry(p, struct active_node, node);
@@ -811,7 +903,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 			 */
 			RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->base.fence, ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
 			node->base.cb.node.prev = (void *)engine;
-			atomic_inc(&ref->count);
+			__i915_active_acquire(ref);
 		}
 		GEM_BUG_ON(rcu_access_pointer(node->base.fence) != ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
index cf4058150966..73ded3c52a04 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
@@ -163,14 +163,16 @@ void __i915_active_init(struct i915_active *ref,
 	__i915_active_init(ref, active, retire, &__mkey, &__wkey);	\
 } while (0)
 
-int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
-		    struct intel_timeline *tl,
-		    struct dma_fence *fence);
+struct dma_fence *
+__i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence);
+int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence);
 
 static inline int
 i915_active_add_request(struct i915_active *ref, struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	return i915_active_ref(ref, i915_request_timeline(rq), &rq->fence);
+	return i915_active_ref(ref,
+			       i915_request_timeline(rq)->fence_context,
+			       &rq->fence);
 }
 
 struct dma_fence *
@@ -198,7 +200,9 @@ int i915_request_await_active(struct i915_request *rq,
 #define I915_ACTIVE_AWAIT_BARRIER BIT(2)
 
 int i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref);
+int i915_active_acquire_for_context(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx);
 bool i915_active_acquire_if_busy(struct i915_active *ref);
+
 void i915_active_release(struct i915_active *ref);
 
 static inline void __i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref)
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-15 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 156+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15 11:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/66] drm/i915: Reduce i915_request.lock contention for i915_request_wait Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/66] drm/i915: Remove i915_request.lock requirement for execution callbacks Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/66] drm/i915: Remove requirement for holding i915_request.lock for breadcrumbs Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/66] drm/i915: Add a couple of missing i915_active_fini() Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 12:00   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-21 12:23   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/66] drm/i915: Skip taking acquire mutex for no ref->active callback Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 12:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-21 12:32   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-07-17 12:21   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/66] drm/i915: Export a preallocate variant of i915_active_acquire() Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-17 12:45     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 13:06       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-21 15:33   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/66] drm/i915: Keep the most recently used active-fence upon discard Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 12:38   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 14:22     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-22  9:46   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/66] drm/i915: Make the stale cached active node available for any timeline Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 13:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 14:28     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 12:40       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-29 13:42         ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 13:53           ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 14:22           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-29 14:39             ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 14:52             ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 15:31               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-22 11:19   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:31     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/66] drm/i915: Provide a fastpath for waiting on vma bindings Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 13:23   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 14:35     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 12:43       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-22 15:07   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/66] drm/i915: Soften the tasklet flush frequency before waits Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 14:23   ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-07-22 15:10   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/66] drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories Chris Wilson
2020-07-20 10:35   ` Matthew Auld
2020-07-23 14:33   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:42     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  7:43       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-27  9:24   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:50     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-30 12:04       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-30 12:28       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-04 14:08         ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-04 16:14           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-08-04 16:14             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/66] drm/i915: Switch to object allocations for page directories Chris Wilson
2020-07-20 10:34   ` Matthew Auld
2020-07-20 10:40     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/66] drm/i915/gem: Don't drop the timeline lock during execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-07-23 16:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:46     ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:51     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/66] drm/i915/gem: Rename execbuf.bind_link to unbound_link Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:11   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/66] drm/i915/gem: Break apart the early i915_vma_pin from execbuf object lookup Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:51   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove the call for no-evict i915_vma_pin Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 14:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 15:04     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-28  9:46   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 15:05     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:58       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/66] drm/i915: Add list_for_each_entry_safe_continue_reverse Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:59   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/66] drm/i915: Always defer fenced work to the worker Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  9:03   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-31 13:28     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 13:31       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/66] drm/i915/gem: Assign context id for async work Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/66] drm/i915/gem: Separate the ww_mutex walker into its own list Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  9:23   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/66] drm/i915/gem: Asynchronous GTT unbinding Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 13:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/66] drm/i915/gem: Bind the fence async for execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-07-27 18:19   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 15:08     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 13:12       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/66] drm/i915/gem: Include cmdparser in common execbuf pinning Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  9:43   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/66] drm/i915/gem: Include secure batch " Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  9:47   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/66] drm/i915/gem: Reintroduce multiple passes for reloc processing Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:05   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/66] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:07   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/66] drm/i915/gem: Pull execbuf dma resv under a single critical section Chris Wilson
2020-07-27 18:08   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 15:16     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-30 12:57       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/66] drm/i915/gem: Replace i915_gem_object.mm.mutex with reservation_ww_class Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 15:43   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-16 15:53     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 11:17       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-29  7:56         ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-29 12:17         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-29 13:44           ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-05 12:12             ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/66] drm/i915: Hold wakeref for the duration of the vma GGTT binding Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/66] drm/i915: Specialise " Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/66] drm/i915/gt: Acquire backing storage for the context Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:27   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/66] drm/i915/gt: Push the wait for the context to bound to the request Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:48   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/66] drm/i915: Remove unused i915_gem_evict_vm() Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:51   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/66] drm/i915/gt: Decouple completed requests on unwind Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/66] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/66] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/66] drm/i915/gt: Free stale request on destroying the virtual engine Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [PATCH 38/66] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/66] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/66] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/66] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/66] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold() Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/66] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/66] drm/i915/gt: Drop atomic for engine->fw_active tracking Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/66] drm/i915/gt: Extract busy-stats for ring-scheduler Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/66] drm/i915/gt: Convert stats.active to plain unsigned int Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/66] drm/i915: Lift waiter/signaler iterators Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/66] drm/i915: Strip out internal priorities Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/66] drm/i915: Remove I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/66] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/66] drm/i915/gt: Do not suspend bonded requests if one hangs Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/66] drm/i915: Teach the i915_dependency to use a double-lock Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/66] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 54/66] drm/i915/gt: Remove timeslice suppression Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 55/66] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 15:33   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 56/66] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 57/66] drm/i915: Replace the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 58/66] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection to the GT Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 59/66] Restore "drm/i915: drop engine_pin/unpin_breadcrumbs_irq" Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 60/66] drm/i915/gt: Couple tasklet scheduling for all CS interrupts Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 61/66] drm/i915/gt: Support creation of 'internal' rings Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 62/66] drm/i915/gt: Use client timeline address for seqno writes Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 63/66] drm/i915/gt: Infrastructure for ring scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 64/66] drm/i915/gt: Implement ring scheduler for gen6/7 Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 65/66] drm/i915/gt: Enable ring scheduling " Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 66/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove timeline nesting from snb relocs Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 13:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/66] drm/i915: Reduce i915_request.lock contention for i915_request_wait Patchwork
2020-07-15 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-15 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-15 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/66] drm/i915: Reduce i915_request.lock contention for i915_request_wait (rev2) Patchwork
2020-07-15 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-15 16:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-07-15 19:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-23 20:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/66] drm/i915: Reduce i915_request.lock contention for i915_request_wait Dave Airlie
2020-07-27  9:35   ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200715115147.11866-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.