All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 2/5] drm/i915/rkl: Add initial workarounds
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:05:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716220551.2730644-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716220551.2730644-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

RKL and TGL share some general gen12 workarounds, but each platform also
has its own platform-specific workarounds.

v2:
 - Add Wa_1604555607 for RKL.  This makes RKL's ctx WA list identical to
   TGL's, so we'll have both functions call the tgl_ function for now;
   this workaround isn't listed for DG1 so we don't want to add it to
   the general gen12_ function.

Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c |  5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 89 +++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
index d03860fef2d7..c26ca029fc0a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
@@ -2843,8 +2843,9 @@ static bool skl_plane_format_mod_supported(struct drm_plane *_plane,
 static bool gen12_plane_supports_mc_ccs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 					enum plane_id plane_id)
 {
-	/* Wa_14010477008:tgl[a0..c0] */
-	if (IS_TGL_REVID(dev_priv, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_C0))
+	/* Wa_14010477008:tgl[a0..c0],rkl[all] */
+	if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv) ||
+	    IS_TGL_REVID(dev_priv, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_C0))
 		return false;
 
 	return plane_id < PLANE_SPRITE4;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 5726cd0a37e0..cef1c122696f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -596,8 +596,8 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	wa_masked_en(wal, GEN9_ROW_CHICKEN4, GEN11_DIS_PICK_2ND_EU);
 }
 
-static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-				     struct i915_wa_list *wal)
+static void gen12_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+				       struct i915_wa_list *wal)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Wa_1409142259:tgl
@@ -607,12 +607,28 @@ static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	 * Wa_1409207793:tgl
 	 * Wa_1409178076:tgl
 	 * Wa_1408979724:tgl
+	 * Wa_14010443199:rkl
+	 * Wa_14010698770:rkl
 	 */
 	WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
 			  GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
 
+	/* WaDisableGPGPUMidThreadPreemption:gen12 */
+	WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(GEN8_CS_CHICKEN1,
+			    GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_LEVEL_MASK,
+			    GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_THREAD_GROUP_LEVEL);
+}
+
+static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+				     struct i915_wa_list *wal)
+{
+	gen12_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
+
 	/*
-	 * Wa_1604555607:gen12 and Wa_1608008084:gen12
+	 * Wa_1604555607:tgl,rkl
+	 *
+	 * Note that the implementation of this workaround is further modified
+	 * according to the FF_MODE2 guidance given by Wa_1608008084:gen12.
 	 * FF_MODE2 register will return the wrong value when read. The default
 	 * value for this register is zero for all fields and there are no bit
 	 * masks. So instead of doing a RMW we should just write the GS Timer
@@ -623,11 +639,6 @@ static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	       FF_MODE2_GS_TIMER_MASK | FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK,
 	       FF_MODE2_GS_TIMER_224  | FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128,
 	       0);
-
-	/* WaDisableGPGPUMidThreadPreemption:tgl */
-	WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(GEN8_CS_CHICKEN1,
-			    GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_LEVEL_MASK,
-			    GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_THREAD_GROUP_LEVEL);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -642,8 +653,10 @@ __intel_engine_init_ctx_wa(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 
 	wa_init_start(wal, name, engine->name);
 
-	if (IS_GEN(i915, 12))
+	if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) || IS_TIGERLAKE(i915))
 		tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
+	else if (IS_GEN(i915, 12))
+		gen12_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
 	else if (IS_GEN(i915, 11))
 		icl_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
 	else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(i915))
@@ -1176,9 +1189,16 @@ icl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
 }
 
 static void
-tgl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
+gen12_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+			  struct i915_wa_list *wal)
 {
 	wa_init_mcr(i915, wal);
+}
+
+static void
+tgl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
+{
+	gen12_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
 
 	/* Wa_1409420604:tgl */
 	if (IS_TGL_REVID(i915, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_A0))
@@ -1196,8 +1216,10 @@ tgl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
 static void
 gt_init_workarounds(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
 {
-	if (IS_GEN(i915, 12))
+	if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915))
 		tgl_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
+	else if (IS_GEN(i915, 12))
+		gen12_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
 	else if (IS_GEN(i915, 11))
 		icl_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
 	else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(i915))
@@ -1629,18 +1651,6 @@ rcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
 			    GEN9_CTX_PREEMPT_REG,
 			    GEN12_DISABLE_POSH_BUSY_FF_DOP_CG);
 
-		/*
-		 * Wa_1607030317:tgl
-		 * Wa_1607186500:tgl
-		 * Wa_1607297627:tgl there is 3 entries for this WA on BSpec, 2
-		 * of then says it is fixed on B0 the other one says it is
-		 * permanent
-		 */
-		wa_masked_en(wal,
-			     GEN6_RC_SLEEP_PSMI_CONTROL,
-			     GEN12_WAIT_FOR_EVENT_POWER_DOWN_DISABLE |
-			     GEN8_RC_SEMA_IDLE_MSG_DISABLE);
-
 		/*
 		 * Wa_1606679103:tgl
 		 * (see also Wa_1606682166:icl)
@@ -1654,22 +1664,17 @@ rcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
 			    VSUNIT_CLKGATE_DIS_TGL);
 	}
 
-	if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
-		/* Wa_1606931601:tgl */
+	if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) || IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
+		/* Wa_1606931601:tgl,rkl */
 		wa_masked_en(wal, GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2, GEN12_DISABLE_EARLY_READ);
 
-		/* Wa_1409804808:tgl */
+		/* Wa_1409804808:tgl,rkl */
 		wa_masked_en(wal, GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2,
 			     GEN12_PUSH_CONST_DEREF_HOLD_DIS);
 
-		/* Wa_1606700617:tgl */
-		wa_masked_en(wal,
-			     GEN9_CS_DEBUG_MODE1,
-			     FF_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE);
-
 		/*
 		 * Wa_1409085225:tgl
-		 * Wa_14010229206:tgl
+		 * Wa_14010229206:tgl,rkl
 		 */
 		wa_masked_en(wal, GEN9_ROW_CHICKEN4, GEN12_DISABLE_TDL_PUSH);
 
@@ -1677,9 +1682,29 @@ rcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
 		 * Wa_1407928979:tgl A*
 		 * Wa_18011464164:tgl B0+
 		 * Wa_22010931296:tgl B0+
+		 * Wa_14010919138:rkl
 		 */
 		wa_write_or(wal, GEN7_FF_THREAD_MODE,
 			    GEN12_FF_TESSELATION_DOP_GATE_DISABLE);
+
+		/*
+		 * Wa_1607030317:tgl
+		 * Wa_1607186500:tgl
+		 * Wa_1607297627:tgl,rkl there are multiple entries for this
+		 * WA in the BSpec; some indicate this is an A0-only WA,
+		 * others indicate it applies to all steppings.
+		 */
+		wa_masked_en(wal,
+			     GEN6_RC_SLEEP_PSMI_CONTROL,
+			     GEN12_WAIT_FOR_EVENT_POWER_DOWN_DISABLE |
+			     GEN8_RC_SEMA_IDLE_MSG_DISABLE);
+	}
+
+	if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
+		/* Wa_1606700617:tgl */
+		wa_masked_en(wal,
+			     GEN9_CS_DEBUG_MODE1,
+			     FF_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE);
 	}
 
 	if (IS_GEN(i915, 11)) {
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16 22:05 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 0/5] Remaining RKL patches Matt Roper
2020-07-16 22:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 1/5] drm/i915/rkl: Handle new DPCLKA_CFGCR0 layout Matt Roper
2020-07-16 22:05 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2020-07-16 22:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 3/5] drm/i915/rkl: Add DPLL4 support Matt Roper
2020-07-17  5:39   ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-07-16 22:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 4/5] drm/i915/rkl: Handle HTI Matt Roper
2020-07-16 23:47   ` Souza, Jose
2021-01-08 12:25   ` Jani Nikula
2020-07-16 22:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 5/5] drm/i915/rkl: Add Wa_14011224835 for PHY B initialization Matt Roper
2020-07-16 23:49   ` Souza, Jose
2020-07-16 22:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Remaining RKL patches (rev7) Patchwork
2020-07-16 22:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-07-17  1:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-17 16:02   ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200716220551.2730644-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.