From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C5CC433F8 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D75122D08 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728156AbgGQOIK (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:08:10 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:11825 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727971AbgGQOH0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:07:26 -0400 IronPort-SDR: B/ViiSt8xVMpZuLwXr2M4YJBgf7pQP6y0HUKFB1qSR/R0Wdbz/3kOwIbDdimicYEviIHx52Hri kgI+jBWnL3yA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9684"; a="167722791" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,362,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="167722791" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jul 2020 07:07:24 -0700 IronPort-SDR: dKnv8/Mvm8i3A8VWBV5Otp+KSGneJrERPsqS7GMfra9YV99nd7is64JoiGeWAXGLvtIj5xqezo bue/XKbwQmhA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,362,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="460856480" Received: from labuser-ice-lake-client-platform.jf.intel.com ([10.54.55.65]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2020 07:07:24 -0700 From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang Subject: [PATCH V6 05/14] perf/x86/intel: Fix the name of perf METRICS Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 07:05:45 -0700 Message-Id: <20200717140554.22863-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200717140554.22863-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> References: <20200717140554.22863-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kan Liang Bit 15 of the PERF_CAPABILITIES MSR indicates that the perf METRICS feature is supported. The perf METRICS is not a PEBS feature. Rename pebs_metrics_available perf_metrics. The bit is not used in the current code. It will be used in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang --- arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h index 7b68ab5f19e7..5d453da8cfa6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ union perf_capabilities { */ u64 full_width_write:1; u64 pebs_baseline:1; - u64 pebs_metrics_available:1; + u64 perf_metrics:1; u64 pebs_output_pt_available:1; }; u64 capabilities; -- 2.17.1