All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
Cc: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-for-5.1] hw/ide: Do not block for AIO while resetting a drive
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:02:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200720100246.GA24159@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717171938.1249-1-f4bug@amsat.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1807 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 07:19:38PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Last minute chat:
> 19:01 <stefanha> f4bug: use bdrv_aio_cancel_async() if possible because it won't block the current thread.
> 19:02 <stefanha> f4bug: For example, in device emulation code where the guest has requested to cancel an I/O request it's often possible to use the async version.
> 19:02 <stefanha> f4bug: But in synchronous code like device reset it may be necessary to use the synchronous (blocking) bdrv_aio_cancel() API instead. :(
> 19:14 <stefanha> f4bug: The way to decide is: will the current function return to the event loop and is there someone who will handle the request completion callback when cancel finishes?
> 19:14 <stefanha> f4bug: If the next line of code requires the request to finished then async cancel cannot be used.
> 19:15 <stefanha> f4bug: On the other hand, if the function can return and it's okay for the request to cancel at some future time then you can use async.
> 
> So I'll revisit this patch :)
> ---
>  hw/ide/core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
> index d997a78e47..e3a9ce7d25 100644
> --- a/hw/ide/core.c
> +++ b/hw/ide/core.c
> @@ -1315,7 +1315,8 @@ static void ide_reset(IDEState *s)
>      trace_ide_reset(s);
>  
>      if (s->pio_aiocb) {
> -        blk_aio_cancel(s->pio_aiocb);
> +        /* If there is a pending AIO callback, invoke it now. */
> +        blk_aio_cancel_async(s->pio_aiocb);

This is a place where an async call is not allowed. The completion
function must be called right away (synchronously) before we can
continue resetting the device.

I sent a patch that allows bdrv_aio_cancel() to find the AioContext so
it can call aio_poll().

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-20 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-17 17:19 [RFC PATCH-for-5.1] hw/ide: Do not block for AIO while resetting a drive Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-17 17:27 ` no-reply
2020-07-20 10:02 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2020-07-21 16:37   ` John Snow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200720100246.GA24159@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=alxndr@bu.edu \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.