From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: tegra: Revert raw_violation_fixup for tegra124 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 12:30:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20200720113008.GA25297@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200717213510.171726-1-kwizart@gmail.com> <20200717215304.GA775582@bjorn-Precision-5520> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nicolas Chauvet Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Manikanta Maddireddy , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:02:59AM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 23:53, Bjorn Helgaas a écrit : > > > Thanks for the quick review. I've addressed all comments and I've > resubmitted a v2 to > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg96863.html > Unfortunately I've missed to modify the [Patch v2] tag. I hope this is > fine. Let me know if I need to resend. > > > Is v5.4.x really the oldest kernel that should get this fix? It looks > > like 191cd6fb5d2c appeared in v5.3. > The commit was introduced in 5.3 indeed. I've added 5.4.x since it's > the last maintained kernel from long term branches. > Now I'm using the Fixes: tag, I've dropped the version of the kernel > for stable as it seems duplicate and less accurate. I have applied this patch to pci/tegra, thanks. Lorenzo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB274C433E3 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BE222B4D for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728419AbgGTLaQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:30:16 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:37644 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728058AbgGTLaQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:30:16 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFCC106F; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 04:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.255]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F7DD3F66E; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 04:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 12:30:08 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Nicolas Chauvet Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Manikanta Maddireddy , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: tegra: Revert raw_violation_fixup for tegra124 Message-ID: <20200720113008.GA25297@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200717213510.171726-1-kwizart@gmail.com> <20200717215304.GA775582@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:02:59AM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 23:53, Bjorn Helgaas a écrit : > > > Thanks for the quick review. I've addressed all comments and I've > resubmitted a v2 to > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg96863.html > Unfortunately I've missed to modify the [Patch v2] tag. I hope this is > fine. Let me know if I need to resend. > > > Is v5.4.x really the oldest kernel that should get this fix? It looks > > like 191cd6fb5d2c appeared in v5.3. > The commit was introduced in 5.3 indeed. I've added 5.4.x since it's > the last maintained kernel from long term branches. > Now I'm using the Fixes: tag, I've dropped the version of the kernel > for stable as it seems duplicate and less accurate. I have applied this patch to pci/tegra, thanks. Lorenzo