From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8091FC433E1 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F09B20717 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:42:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5F09B20717 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=eu.citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jxxDb-0001yT-0S; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:42:23 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jxxDZ-0001xV-Lz for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:42:21 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: e7aef92c-cb81-11ea-85a2-bc764e2007e4 Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk (unknown [2001:ba8:1e3::]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id e7aef92c-cb81-11ea-85a2-bc764e2007e4; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.18.45.5] (helo=zealot.relativity.greenend.org.uk) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 4.84_2 #1) with esmtp (return-path ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk) id 1jxxDW-0001u7-8s; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:42:18 +0100 From: Ian Jackson To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: [OSSTEST PATCH 01/14] sg-report-flight: Add a comment re same-flight search narrowing Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:41:52 +0100 Message-Id: <20200721184205.15232-2-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200721184205.15232-1-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> References: <20200721184205.15232-1-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ian Jackson Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" In afe851ca1771e5da6395b596afa69e509dbbc278 sg-report-flight: When justifying, disregard out-of-flight build jobs we narrowed sg-report-flight's search algorith. An extensive justification is in the commit message. I think much of this information belongs in-tree, so c&p it (with slight edits) here. No code change. Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson --- sg-report-flight | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/sg-report-flight b/sg-report-flight index 6c481f6f..927ea37d 100755 --- a/sg-report-flight +++ b/sg-report-flight @@ -242,9 +242,27 @@ END # jobs. We start with all jobs in $tflight, and for each job # we also process any other jobs it refers to in *buildjob runvars. # + # The real thing we want to check that the build jobs *in the + # same flight as the justifying job* used the right revisions. + # Build jobs from other flights were either (i) build jobs for + # components not being targed for testing by this branch, but + # which were necessary for the justifying job and for which we + # decided to reuse another build job (in which case we don't + # really care what versions they used, even if underlying it + # all there might be a different version of a tree we are + # actually interested in (ii) the kind of continuous update + # thing seen with freebsdbuildjob. + # + # (This is rather different to cs-bisection-step, which is + # less focused on changes in a particular set of trees.) + # + # So we limit the scope of our recursive descent into build + # jobs, to jobs in the same flight. + # # We don't actually use a recursive algorithm because that # would involve recursive use of the same sql query object; # hence the @binfos_todo queue. + my @binfos_todo; my $binfos_queue = sub { my ($inflight,$q,$why) = @_; -- 2.20.1