All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] zonefs: use zone-append for AIO as well
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:53:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200722145301.GB20266@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR04MB375139CC436B04DDE02B8560E7790@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:02:14PM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> That is the general idea. But Christoph point was that reporting the effective
> write offset back to user space can be done not only for zone append, but also
> for regular FS/files that are open with O_APPEND and being written with AIOs,
> legacy or io_uring. Since for this case, the aio->aio_offset field is ignored
> and the kiocb pos is initialized with the file size, then incremented with size
> for the next AIO, the user never actually sees the actual write offset of its
> AIOs. Reporting that back for regular files too can be useful, even though
> current application can do without this (or do not use O_APPEND because it is
> lacking).
> 
> Christoph, please loudly shout at me if I misunderstood you :)

I'd never shout at you :)  But yes, this is correct.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-22 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-20 13:21 [PATCH 0/2] zonefs: use zone-append for aio with rwf append Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-20 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: fix kiocb ki_complete interface Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-20 13:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-20 13:43     ` Damien Le Moal
2020-07-20 13:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-20 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] zonefs: use zone-append for AIO as well Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-20 13:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-20 16:48     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-21  5:54       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-22 12:43         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-22 13:02           ` Damien Le Moal
2020-07-22 14:53             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-07-22 14:51           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-22 15:00             ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-07-24 13:57             ` Kanchan Joshi
2020-07-27  3:12               ` Damien Le Moal
2020-07-21 12:43   ` Kanchan Joshi
2020-07-22 14:32     ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200722145301.GB20266@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.