On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:03:10 +0200 Janosch Frank wrote: > On 7/21/20 4:28 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 21/07/2020 10.52, Janosch Frank wrote: > >> On 7/21/20 9:28 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > >>> On 17/07/2020 16.58, Janosch Frank wrote: > >>>> If a exception new psw mask contains a key a specification exception > >>>> instead of a special operation exception is presented. > >>> > >>> I have troubles parsing that sentence... could you write that differently? > >>> (and: "s/a exception/an exception/") > >> > >> How about: > >> > >> When an exception psw new with a storage key in its mask is loaded from > >> lowcore a specification exception is raised instead of the special > >> operation exception that is normally presented when skrf is active. > > > > Still a huge beast of a sentence. Could you maybe make two sentences out > > of it? For example: > > > > " ... is raised. This differs from the normal case where ..." > > When an exception psw new with a storage key in its mask is loaded from > lowcore a specification exception is raised. This behavior differs from > the one that is presented when trying to execute skey related > instructions which will raise special operation exceptions. s/psw new/new psw/ ? (And probably a comma after 'lowcore'.) "This differs from the behaviour when trying to execute skey related instructions, which will result in special operation exceptions." ?