All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, qiming.yang@intel.com,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	arybchenko@solarflare.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net: fix TSO packet checksum incorrect
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:29:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200728092907.GT5869@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200728085531.204296-1-yuying.zhang@intel.com>

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:55:31AM +0000, Yuying Zhang wrote:
> The ol_flags check lacks of PKT_TX_IPV6 which causes checksum
> flag configuration error while IPv6/TCP TSO packet is sent.
> This patch fixes the issue using PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK.
> 
> Fixes: 520059a41aa9 ("net: check fragmented headers in non-debug as well")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_net/rte_net.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_net.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_net.h
> index 1edc283a4..4b617ab4c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_net.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_net.h
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ rte_net_intel_cksum_flags_prepare(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint64_t ol_flags)
>  	 * Mainly it is required to avoid fragmented headers check if
>  	 * no offloads are requested.
>  	 */
> -	if (!(ol_flags & (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK)))
> +	if (!(ol_flags & PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	if (ol_flags & (PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 | PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6))
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

I think the PKT_TX_TCP_SEG flag is missing in the test above, it
should be like this:

 if (!(ol_flags & (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK | PKT_TX_TCP_SEG)))

It would be more precise than having the whole list of offload flags.

The reason is because in case of TSOv4, there is always the flag
PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM, so this test is always wrong and we continue in the
function. In case of TSOv6, there is neither PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM nor
PKT_TX_L4_TCP (which is not mandatory, the doc says that PKT_TX_TCP_SEG
implies PKT_TX_L4_TCP).

Thanks for spotting this. Can you please submit a v2 with
PKT_TX_TCP_SEG?

Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-28  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-28  8:55 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net: fix TSO packet checksum incorrect Yuying Zhang
2020-07-28  9:29 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2020-07-29 15:58   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-07-28 17:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] net: fix TSO packets " Yuying Zhang
2020-07-29  2:28   ` Xie, WeiX
2020-07-29  7:49   ` Olivier Matz
2020-07-29 16:00     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-07-29  8:54   ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 10:03     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-07-30  2:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] net: fix bad checksum in offloaded TSOv6 packets Yuying Zhang
2020-07-30  2:25   ` Zhang, Yuying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200728092907.GT5869@platinum \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.