From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/42] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock requirement for intel_rps_boost() Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 17:43:39 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200802164412.2738-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200802164412.2738-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Since we use a flag within i915_request.flags to indicate when we have boosted the request (so that we only apply the boost) once, this can be used as the serialisation with i915_request_retire() to avoid having to explicitly take the i915_request.lock which is more heavily contended. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 15 ++++++--------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c index e6a00eea0631..2a43e216e0d4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c @@ -889,17 +889,15 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps) void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq) { - struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps; - unsigned long flags; - - if (i915_request_signaled(rq) || !intel_rps_is_active(rps)) + if (i915_request_signaled(rq) || i915_request_has_waitboost(rq)) return; /* Serializes with i915_request_retire() */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags); - if (!i915_request_has_waitboost(rq) && - !dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(&rq->fence)) { - set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags); + if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) { + struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps; + + if (!intel_rps_is_active(rps)) + return; GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "boost fence:%llx:%llx\n", rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno); @@ -910,7 +908,6 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq) atomic_inc(&rps->boosts); } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags); } int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index f7865e22afa9..67267b0d5b06 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -306,10 +306,8 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq) spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); } - if (i915_request_has_waitboost(rq)) { - GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&rq->engine->gt->rps.num_waiters)); + if (test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) atomic_dec(&rq->engine->gt->rps.num_waiters); - } /* * We only loosely track inflight requests across preemption, -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-02 16:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-08-02 16:43 [Intel-gfx] Time, where did it go? Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/42] drm/i915/gem: Don't drop the timeline lock during execbuf Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce context termination list iteration guard to RCU Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/42] drm/i915/gt: Protect context lifetime with RCU Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/42] drm/i915/gt: Free stale request on destroying the virtual engine Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/42] drm/i915/gt: Track signaled breadcrumbs outside of the breadcrumb spinlock Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/42] drm/i915/gt: Split the breadcrumb spinlock between global and contexts Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/42] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock serialisation around await_start Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` Chris Wilson [this message] 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce ctx->engine_mutex for reading the clone source Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce ctx->engines_mutex for get_engines() Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/42] drm/i915: Reduce test_and_set_bit to set_bit in i915_request_submit() Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/42] drm/i915/gt: Decouple completed requests on unwind Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/42] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/42] drm/i915/gt: Refactor heartbeat request construction and submission Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/42] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/42] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/42] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/42] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/42] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/42] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold() Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/42] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/42] drm/i915/gt: Drop atomic for engine->fw_active tracking Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/42] drm/i915/gt: Extract busy-stats for ring-scheduler Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/42] drm/i915/gt: Convert stats.active to plain unsigned int Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/42] drm/i915: Lift waiter/signaler iterators Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/42] drm/i915: Strip out internal priorities Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/42] drm/i915: Remove I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/42] drm/i915/gt: Defer the kmem_cache_free() until after the HW submit Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/42] drm/i915: Prune empty priolists Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/42] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/42] drm/i915/gt: Do not suspend bonded requests if one hangs Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/42] drm/i915: Teach the i915_dependency to use a double-lock Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/42] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/42] drm/i915/selftests: Measure set-priority duration Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/42] drm/i915: Improve DFS for priority inheritance Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/42] drm/i915/gt: Remove timeslice suppression Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/42] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/42] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/42] drm/i915: Replace the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/42] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection back to the context Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/42] drm/i915/gt: Another tweak for flushing the tasklets Chris Wilson 2020-08-02 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Patchwork 2020-08-02 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2020-08-02 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2020-08-02 17:56 ` [Intel-gfx] Time, where did it go? Dave Airlie 2020-08-02 19:36 ` Chris Wilson 2020-08-04 21:45 ` Dave Airlie 2020-08-07 7:12 ` Chris Wilson 2020-08-09 20:01 ` Dave Airlie 2020-08-02 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200802164412.2738-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \ --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --subject='Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/42] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock requirement for intel_rps_boost()' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.