From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA901C433DF for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69DF2173E for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728712AbgHETp0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:45:26 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:45454 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729186AbgHETpP (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:45:15 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 29CB91C0BD2; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 21:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 21:45:12 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Konrad Dybcio List-Id: Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , SoC Team , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] ARM: SoC: changes for v5.9 Message-ID: <20200805194512.bh5hds2l46opcole@duo.ucw.cz> References: <20200805172746.GC1118@bug> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v2jz4bfp3v7pyu7z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --v2jz4bfp3v7pyu7z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > Thanks for all the kind words, I really appreciate it. Thanks for good work :-). > >My impression is that the newly added phones are still fairly rudimentar= y, > >but some others that were added in the past releases have gotten > >further. I don't know any details, but I've added Konrad to Cc, he can > >comment on his work. >=20 > Thanks for adding me. The Sony sdm630/6 phones are shaping up really > well, but most of the work is not upstreamed yet mainly due to SMMU > maintainers not liking Qualcomm code and looking for cleaner > solutions. As time progresses, more things will see the light of the > upstream. The current-ish progress can be seen on my github [1]. And > much more is yet to come. >=20 > Regarding msm8992/4, there is a need for the 20nm DSI PHY driver. It > exists for every other gen of qcom SoCs since 2013, but due to low > interest in these platforms, this specific one never got there. I > tried emailing the person who wrote most of the present ones, but > gmail told me the mail didn't exist :shrug:. I won't pretend to understand all this. Do you normally have modems working? > >> Should we have some kind of linux-phones mailing list? There is quite = a lot of > >> stuff common in phones. >=20 > >PostmarketOS is probably the right place to look for this. >=20 > First of all: postmarketOS, not PostmarketOS :P >=20 > I would actually say that's incorrect. With the release of the > PinePhone and the Librem 5, the Linux mobile community has entered its > heyday and plenty mobile-oriented distributions have arisen (for > example Mobian, Manjaro ARM, Pure OS-ARM etc.) and some have gotten > more attention than before (think Ubuntu Touch, Maemo Leste). pmOS is > only one of many. >=20 > The current thing to do is every distro maintains their own kernel (or > over 100 like in pmOS, which is terrible for the poor CI :/) and only > a small percentage of patches end up being upstreamed for various > reasons (clean-ness of the code, will of the maintainers, time > constraints..). As time goes, we're gonna see more stuff being > added. I did not know how popular PinePhone is. Does it currently have useful battery life? Would something like phone@vger.kernel.org be useful for low-level stuff? Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --v2jz4bfp3v7pyu7z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCXysMSAAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8phFAJ4z18tm5ObumuMFHNk30LayrjBw8gCfZ7oRyGDbXIqWqqdKsst3BA+ROQ4= =OxLd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v2jz4bfp3v7pyu7z-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CC3C433DF for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E981921D95 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="y64et/fS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E981921D95 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type:Cc: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=/bEg9Z6n1o1oPJsUABXAtH+KaBA+fmsqIkBPaeOmX60=; b=y64et/fSJFQTVhSQOWXmkNqII MnLJbwIxK64e3kWT+3pWkUSjR4JqhaZYa1QnWlfULf0eiR+tMrhnnAcs6kttoF5Pb2Vvanm8sTUbY BZGM45JgfTVFRg4QMW7BVGhq0bMFqu2iWeoW2c90xuxTIPsk0slVwVdJRRI1qacG40UAFg+OyxmMw CtpN1YrMNG3tFtD4lBLy20FOUKeabst3ylncHkR6f9AGQIRt7gUpEZwIbCuOkT/29CrG1DpFU2+ap oh5kBGz4C2ZkJ3m/S/pLGAR3ealFosblXvKC+Q0R1sFRK8Fo6s/iOkc9VomjEwOH82yoAUxTCuAza Q0p60Nk2w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3PLh-0000QP-Vn; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 19:45:18 +0000 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3PLf-0000Pn-96 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 19:45:16 +0000 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 29CB91C0BD2; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 21:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 21:45:12 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Konrad Dybcio Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] ARM: SoC: changes for v5.9 Message-ID: <20200805194512.bh5hds2l46opcole@duo.ucw.cz> References: <20200805172746.GC1118@bug> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200805_154515_475344_1552F2D9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Cc: Linux ARM , SoC Team , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3902181032147026161==" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============3902181032147026161== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v2jz4bfp3v7pyu7z" Content-Disposition: inline --v2jz4bfp3v7pyu7z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > Thanks for all the kind words, I really appreciate it. Thanks for good work :-). > >My impression is that the newly added phones are still fairly rudimentar= y, > >but some others that were added in the past releases have gotten > >further. I don't know any details, but I've added Konrad to Cc, he can > >comment on his work. >=20 > Thanks for adding me. The Sony sdm630/6 phones are shaping up really > well, but most of the work is not upstreamed yet mainly due to SMMU > maintainers not liking Qualcomm code and looking for cleaner > solutions. As time progresses, more things will see the light of the > upstream. The current-ish progress can be seen on my github [1]. And > much more is yet to come. >=20 > Regarding msm8992/4, there is a need for the 20nm DSI PHY driver. It > exists for every other gen of qcom SoCs since 2013, but due to low > interest in these platforms, this specific one never got there. I > tried emailing the person who wrote most of the present ones, but > gmail told me the mail didn't exist :shrug:. I won't pretend to understand all this. Do you normally have modems working? > >> Should we have some kind of linux-phones mailing list? There is quite = a lot of > >> stuff common in phones. >=20 > >PostmarketOS is probably the right place to look for this. >=20 > First of all: postmarketOS, not PostmarketOS :P >=20 > I would actually say that's incorrect. With the release of the > PinePhone and the Librem 5, the Linux mobile community has entered its > heyday and plenty mobile-oriented distributions have arisen (for > example Mobian, Manjaro ARM, Pure OS-ARM etc.) and some have gotten > more attention than before (think Ubuntu Touch, Maemo Leste). pmOS is > only one of many. >=20 > The current thing to do is every distro maintains their own kernel (or > over 100 like in pmOS, which is terrible for the poor CI :/) and only > a small percentage of patches end up being upstreamed for various > reasons (clean-ness of the code, will of the maintainers, time > constraints..). As time goes, we're gonna see more stuff being > added. I did not know how popular PinePhone is. Does it currently have useful battery life? Would something like phone@vger.kernel.org be useful for low-level stuff? Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --v2jz4bfp3v7pyu7z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCXysMSAAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8phFAJ4z18tm5ObumuMFHNk30LayrjBw8gCfZ7oRyGDbXIqWqqdKsst3BA+ROQ4= =OxLd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v2jz4bfp3v7pyu7z-- --===============3902181032147026161== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============3902181032147026161==--