All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com,
	kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de,
	chriscool@tuxfamily.org, liu.denton@gmail.com, me@ttaylorr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] t7401: ensure uniformity in the '--for-status' test
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:20:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200806085043.GB13942@konoha> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq3650ok53.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

On 05/08 02:30, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > The '--for-status' test got its expected output from stdin. This is
> > inconsistent with the other tests in the test script which get their
> > expected output from a file named 'expected'.
> >
> > So, change the syntax of the '--for-status' test for uniformity.
> 
> There are a handful examples in t5401 and another one in t3700 that
> give the "golden master" from the standard input.  When the expected
> output is used only once, I do not think it is particularlly bad to
> have it this way.  So,... meh?

I realised what you were trying to say after checking out t5400 and
t3700. I understand that this change may not be immediately needed but I
think it does make reading the diff a bit easier since having a '-' as a
file name does get a bit confusing when reading the output. If a
separeate commit just for this change is a problem then I can squash
this with the previous commit? What do you think?

> Unless there is a compelling reason to insist both are files
> (that may make it easier to enhance test_cmp in a certain way
> you plan to, for example), that is.
> 
> > Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
> > Mentored-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  t/t7401-submodule-summary.sh | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/t/t7401-submodule-summary.sh b/t/t7401-submodule-summary.sh
> > index 18fefdb0ba..145914cd5a 100755
> > --- a/t/t7401-submodule-summary.sh
> > +++ b/t/t7401-submodule-summary.sh
> > @@ -285,13 +285,14 @@ EOF
> >  
> >  test_expect_success '--for-status' "
> >  	git submodule summary --for-status HEAD^ >actual &&
> > -	test_i18ncmp actual - <<EOF
> > +	cat >expected <<-EOF &&
> >  * sm1 $head6...0000000:
> >  
> >  * sm2 0000000...$head7 (2):
> >    > Add foo9
> >  
> >  EOF
> > +	test_i18ncmp expected actual
> >  "
> >  
> >  test_expect_success 'fail when using --files together with --cached' "

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-06 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-05 17:49 [GSoC][RESEND][PATCH 0/4] t7401: modernize, cleanup and warn Shourya Shukla
2020-08-05 17:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] t7401: modernize style Shourya Shukla
2020-08-05 19:37   ` Denton Liu
2020-08-05 20:49     ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-06  8:45       ` Shourya Shukla
2020-08-05 17:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] t7401: change test_i18ncmp syntax for clarity Shourya Shukla
2020-08-05 20:58   ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-05 21:23   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-05 17:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] t7401: ensure uniformity in the '--for-status' test Shourya Shukla
2020-08-05 21:01   ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-05 22:25     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-05 22:26       ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-05 21:30   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-06  8:50     ` Shourya Shukla [this message]
2020-08-06 17:18       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-05 17:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] t7401: add a WARNING and a NEEDSWORK Shourya Shukla
2020-08-05 21:04   ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-05 21:36   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-06 11:27     ` Shourya Shukla
2020-08-06 21:11       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-07 14:55         ` Christian Couder
2020-08-12 19:27 ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 0/4] t7401: modernize, cleanup and more Shourya Shukla
2020-08-12 19:27   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] t7401: modernize style Shourya Shukla
2020-08-13  8:06     ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2020-08-13 16:46       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-14 14:41         ` Shourya Shukla
2020-08-14 17:06           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-12 19:27   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] t7401: change test_i18ncmp syntax for clarity Shourya Shukla
2020-08-12 20:57     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-12 21:02       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-14 14:57         ` Shourya Shukla
2020-08-12 19:27   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] t7401: change indentation for enhanced readability Shourya Shukla
2020-08-12 19:27   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] t7401: add a NEEDSWORK Shourya Shukla
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-26 14:25 [GSoC][PATCH 0/4] t7401: modernize, cleanup and warn Shourya Shukla
2020-07-26 14:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] t7401: ensure uniformity in the '--for-status' test Shourya Shukla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200806085043.GB13942@konoha \
    --to=shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
    --cc=liu.denton@gmail.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.