From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MIME_BASE64_TEXT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862F4C433E0 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52AB22E01 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="B8RRnKd3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726403AbgHFPpX (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:45:23 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:55473 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725927AbgHFOUQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:20:16 -0400 X-UUID: c21eb5ad084c4d4583c72c78fe8f7549-20200806 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From; bh=3gLQcEfwtJI1Q0Ph3JAitnDfiUoVRJTnHH6hq25dato=; b=B8RRnKd3HPHMdUq3sU1Y/9nIiP7NlY9nDLUnwXh8mJ+Uh4dCfC49erokAyAV8aeJ80pn9xeTomcWvJT1eyrcLK0DSf01b+QgrU1bpnnwKIrKknwJsTjD5DmPlnkOgfDBZ7f6AoJUKzklvwjDxVfiSTgmbYYOz+6SBhPMxqXTuzo=; X-UUID: c21eb5ad084c4d4583c72c78fe8f7549-20200806 Received: from mtkcas06.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.30)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (Cellopoint E-mail Firewall v4.1.10 Build 0809 with TLS) with ESMTP id 1258676737; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:08:14 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.30) by mtkmbs05n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:08:11 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:08:11 +0800 From: Mark-PK Tsai To: , Mark-PK Tsai CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip: irq-mt58xx: Add mt58xx series interrupt Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:07:39 +0800 Message-ID: <20200806140739.31501-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MTK: N Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org RnJvbTogRGFuaWVsIFBhbG1lciA8ZGFuaWVsQDB4MGYuY29tPg0KDQo+IEhpIE1hcmstUEssDQo+ IA0KPiBZb3VyIGRyaXZlciBzZWVtcyB0byBiZSBmb3IgdGhlIHNhbWUgaW50ZXJydXB0IGNvbnRy b2xsZXIgSVAgdGhhdCBpcw0KPiBwcmVzZW50IGluIE1TdGFyJ3MgVFYgYW5kIGNhbWVyYSBTb0Nz IGFuZCBub3cgU2lnbWFTdGFyJ3MgU29Dcy4NCj4gSSBzZW50IGEgc2VyaWVzWzBdIGZvciBhIGRy aXZlciB2ZXJ5IHNpbWlsYXIgdG8geW91cnMgYnV0IGZvciB0aGUNCj4gTVN0YXIgU29Dcy4gRG8g eW91IGtub3cgaWYgaXQgd291bGQgYmUgcG9zc2libGUgdG8gY29uZmlybSBpZiB0aGV5IGFyZQ0K PiB0aGUNCj4gc2FtZSB0aGluZz8gTWVkaWFUZWsgYm91Z2h0IE1TdGFyIGEgZmV3IHllYXJzIGFn byBzbyBpdCBzZWVtcyBsaWtlbHkNCj4gYnV0IEkgaGF2ZSBubyBoYXJkIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uLg0K PiANCg0KWWVzLCBpdCdzIGZvciB0aGUgc2FtZSBpbnRlcnJ1cHQgY29udHJvbGxlciBJUC4NCg0K PiBJZiB0aGV5IGFyZSB0aGUgc2FtZSB0aGluZyBjb3VsZCB3ZSB3b3JrIG9uIG1ha2luZyBvbmUg c2VyaWVzIHRoYXQNCj4gc3VwcG9ydHMgYm90aCB1c2UgY2FzZXM/DQoNClN1cmUsIGFuZCBJIHRo aW5rIHRoZSBpcnEgY29udHJvbGxlciBkcml2ZXIgc2hvdWxkIHN1cHBvcnQgYm90aCB1c2UgY2Fz ZXMuDQpTbyBob3cgYWJvdXQga2VlcCB0aGUgTVRLIHZlcnNpb24gZHJpdmVyPw0KSSdsbCBzZW5k IHBhdGNoIHYyIGFmdGVyIC1yYzEgYXMgSSBtZW50aW9uZWQgaW4gdGhlIHByZXZpb3VzIG1haWws DQphbmQga2VlcCB5b3UgcG9zdGVkLg0KQW5kIGFueSBzdWdnZXN0aW9uIGlzIHdlbGNvbWUuIDop DQoNCj4gSXQncyBhbHNvIHBvc3NpYmxlIHRoYXQgaWYgdGhlIGludGVycnVwdCBjb250cm9sbGVy IGlzIHRoZSBzYW1lIHNvbWUNCj4gb3RoZXIgdGhpbmdzIGxpa2UgdGhlIFNQSSBOT1IgY29udHJv bGxlciBldGMgYXJlIGFsc28gY29tbW9uIGFuZA0KPiB3b3JraW5nDQo+IG9uIGEgc2luZ2xlIGRy aXZlciBmb3IgdGhvc2Ugd291bGQgc2F2ZSB1cyBib3RoIHRpbWUuDQo+IA0KDQpJJ20gbm90IHN1 cmUgYWJvdXQgdGhhdC4NCkknbGwgY2hlY2sgdGhlIHBhdGNoZXMgeW91IGNvbnRyaWJ1dGVkIGFu ZCBjb25maXJtIHdpdGggb3VyIGRyaXZlciBvd25lcnMu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B9DC433E0 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50B7E2310F for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="mSj4MVcw"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="B8RRnKd3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 50B7E2310F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=5VEXkwgFYtIeZXd0vfkzgK/J3jTnIRh/9I+Y78VR+4k=; b=mSj4MVcwCOl1oAwHqMteow0uf B/bXsDGsdHacAYSoTiSeUO7dmKXr9LF/3kZsWfVUTUO30hEkyzorYxrmZhS4jD97wja/X3kBLCIRO 4b+vDjI1M9JBO0X7g1nb74ZdKdG9E4d4/PCkpvesR/eFZhZu1lWe8BtyWxKaC8jDrjlLOFwfqcG+U 6xI7Op6OQqMm0mMyqxn55PjLeSLPASXnWFqRFIgCRiDNRJVFp13yOdZZ0FAZq2/OX5Q0g76gksKZc xsjet6BjJXNNotJE8l5rs2iJ7AexMju4IuA8J1qd3CzwNJ+NrF5oVba4x1gKsmBg3yh2HRLMFkW+8 G6RMcFaWw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3gZH-0000iU-Ft; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:08:27 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3gZE-0000hq-KO; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:08:25 +0000 X-UUID: f3cfdcd43d714207b8e0b7cde6925de1-20200806 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From; bh=3gLQcEfwtJI1Q0Ph3JAitnDfiUoVRJTnHH6hq25dato=; b=B8RRnKd3HPHMdUq3sU1Y/9nIiP7NlY9nDLUnwXh8mJ+Uh4dCfC49erokAyAV8aeJ80pn9xeTomcWvJT1eyrcLK0DSf01b+QgrU1bpnnwKIrKknwJsTjD5DmPlnkOgfDBZ7f6AoJUKzklvwjDxVfiSTgmbYYOz+6SBhPMxqXTuzo=; X-UUID: f3cfdcd43d714207b8e0b7cde6925de1-20200806 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1628766620; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:08:16 -0800 Received: from mtkmbs05n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.15) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:08:12 -0700 Received: from MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.30) by mtkmbs05n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:08:11 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:08:11 +0800 From: Mark-PK Tsai To: , Mark-PK Tsai Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip: irq-mt58xx: Add mt58xx series interrupt Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:07:39 +0800 Message-ID: <20200806140739.31501-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200806_100824_887795_EDC5228C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.48 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alix.wu@mediatek.com, jason@lakedaemon.net, maz@kernel.org, yj.chiang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Daniel Palmer > Hi Mark-PK, > > Your driver seems to be for the same interrupt controller IP that is > present in MStar's TV and camera SoCs and now SigmaStar's SoCs. > I sent a series[0] for a driver very similar to yours but for the > MStar SoCs. Do you know if it would be possible to confirm if they are > the > same thing? MediaTek bought MStar a few years ago so it seems likely > but I have no hard information. > Yes, it's for the same interrupt controller IP. > If they are the same thing could we work on making one series that > supports both use cases? Sure, and I think the irq controller driver should support both use cases. So how about keep the MTK version driver? I'll send patch v2 after -rc1 as I mentioned in the previous mail, and keep you posted. And any suggestion is welcome. :) > It's also possible that if the interrupt controller is the same some > other things like the SPI NOR controller etc are also common and > working > on a single driver for those would save us both time. > I'm not sure about that. I'll check the patches you contributed and confirm with our driver owners. _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3A8C433DF for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E3B2310F for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OID93BWu"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="B8RRnKd3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 22E3B2310F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6O14M0lLkquxIYD4uUbxDUh9U7XwUkrCoRG5IAd1l58=; b=OID93BWupwuCb38BkCcXxd4Lp SWJh92CfiNfpm1FlNV2LFctQVK56pGzl4sXKqEzgiAJmZHmz2IZ1mWVNPVUPoijF961vk5+X64WR9 SMI7OzC9iyB5RFz2O34oi96H9vh6fLu0lcmo7qQUt3/ApMqO8dZ9+IGO/b4oFMLgEMVQhCPr0OS6b KT6LKASalQU/iYA3+Nj6p05W9Z+YvubCNGIprfuq8f2LJzq11Ku9mmoRrjQvomEOx3y61w8qjtR9h ep+mmtgtwrH8hxOvH+8bVRGHOdjQQZ/vXYqS/5xUSif/QmlZHgoYPQYL6FE8VrOb+5juSOIbkPEfX FOz/E6NCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3gZI-0000ie-Kv; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:08:28 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3gZE-0000hq-KO; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:08:25 +0000 X-UUID: f3cfdcd43d714207b8e0b7cde6925de1-20200806 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From; bh=3gLQcEfwtJI1Q0Ph3JAitnDfiUoVRJTnHH6hq25dato=; b=B8RRnKd3HPHMdUq3sU1Y/9nIiP7NlY9nDLUnwXh8mJ+Uh4dCfC49erokAyAV8aeJ80pn9xeTomcWvJT1eyrcLK0DSf01b+QgrU1bpnnwKIrKknwJsTjD5DmPlnkOgfDBZ7f6AoJUKzklvwjDxVfiSTgmbYYOz+6SBhPMxqXTuzo=; X-UUID: f3cfdcd43d714207b8e0b7cde6925de1-20200806 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1628766620; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:08:16 -0800 Received: from mtkmbs05n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.15) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:08:12 -0700 Received: from MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.30) by mtkmbs05n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:08:11 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:08:11 +0800 From: Mark-PK Tsai To: , Mark-PK Tsai Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip: irq-mt58xx: Add mt58xx series interrupt Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:07:39 +0800 Message-ID: <20200806140739.31501-1-mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200806_100824_887795_EDC5228C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.48 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alix.wu@mediatek.com, jason@lakedaemon.net, maz@kernel.org, yj.chiang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Daniel Palmer > Hi Mark-PK, > > Your driver seems to be for the same interrupt controller IP that is > present in MStar's TV and camera SoCs and now SigmaStar's SoCs. > I sent a series[0] for a driver very similar to yours but for the > MStar SoCs. Do you know if it would be possible to confirm if they are > the > same thing? MediaTek bought MStar a few years ago so it seems likely > but I have no hard information. > Yes, it's for the same interrupt controller IP. > If they are the same thing could we work on making one series that > supports both use cases? Sure, and I think the irq controller driver should support both use cases. So how about keep the MTK version driver? I'll send patch v2 after -rc1 as I mentioned in the previous mail, and keep you posted. And any suggestion is welcome. :) > It's also possible that if the interrupt controller is the same some > other things like the SPI NOR controller etc are also common and > working > on a single driver for those would save us both time. > I'm not sure about that. I'll check the patches you contributed and confirm with our driver owners. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel