From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3D7C433DF for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557F5206E9 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JQoypGuH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 557F5206E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56854 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k554l-0007r3-I5 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:30:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k553y-0006zb-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:29:54 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:35113 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k553w-00029G-Uc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:29:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597055392; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Za5DNiUncgceOHs2f2E+7rlc/2IrxHziQ2J9MqtFWVY=; b=JQoypGuHm9eY0p3DftJS5hlewEJ6K5emrSfdI4BKVM50SIbelkmjtmi7gEeSpjbwqiz8j5 CJVPCdkFkXokGa17G2Mhy8iR4sYVCAsok+iIlvTREKNHrdYaM2jl/2SP1JEtmUdGUYl6gm 7Dt4XfgDvGRWnUCp3lgoC6+6WAUCguQ= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-307-W3xUvwhSPNSWrmwNXMzZag-1; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:29:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: W3xUvwhSPNSWrmwNXMzZag-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A2118014D7; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-112-218.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.218]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337BA5D9CC; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:29:45 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Philippe =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlldS1EYXVkw6k=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/system/s390x: Add a chapter about s390x boot devices Message-ID: <20200810122945.773f0349.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200806150507.12073-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20200810121847.5ab4e227.cohuck@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=cohuck@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.81; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/10 04:13:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:20:53 +0200 Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > On 8/10/20 12:18 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:05:07 +0200 > > Thomas Huth wrote: > > =20 > >> Booting on s390x is a little bit different compared to other architect= ures. > >> Let's add some information for people who are not yet used to this. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > >> --- > >> docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= + > >> docs/system/target-s390x.rst | 1 + > >> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst > >> > >> diff --git a/docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst b/docs/system/s390x/boo= tdevices.rst > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000000..68f0ffd450 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/docs/system/s390x/bootdevices.rst > >> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ > >> +Boot devices on s390x > >> +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >> + > >> +Booting with bootindex parameter > >> +-------------------------------- > >> + > >> +For classical mainframe guests (i.e. LPAR or z/VM installations), you= always > >> +have to exactly specify the disk where you want to boot from (or "IPL= " from, =20 > >=20 > > s/exactly/explictly/ ? =20 >=20 > Or "to explicit the disk ..."? Hm, not sure what that means?