From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D80C433E0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EA52073A for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hJM2otlY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726877AbgHJNI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:26 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:53126 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726462AbgHJNIZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597064904; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pbpPyMxeUTZufAlT4TB0KbZ9dM5w1NZ9B6YwnpXi1/s=; b=hJM2otlYUoPY7VxeCg+9S/SuDdXK/EMb63r95YBavEpwFYYx2bHe7xw5vabFMzkA9bv3aG GO+rnV5h9LFmhpGEzzGShn29p21HXvBnVGFrRX+y6S4jLgkre3rLGiwT2g0SAsWo7octz4 xzEhTG6JX1B3/EzsojREJRmGfBPmSv8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-98-bwrUS9gAOm6o0zWQN2BguA-1; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bwrUS9gAOm6o0zWQN2BguA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B63918A0F03; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from horse.redhat.com (unknown [10.10.115.251]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EAE10013C2; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by horse.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 10451) id 3286022036A; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:09 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: Miklos Szeredi , Dan Williams , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs-list , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support Message-ID: <20200810130809.GA455528@redhat.com> References: <20200807195526.426056-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:29:47AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:55 PM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > Most of the changes are limited to fuse/virtiofs. There are couple > > of changes needed in generic dax infrastructure and couple of changes > > in virtio to be able to access shared memory region. > > So what's the plan for merging the different subsystems? I can take > all that into the fuse tree, but would need ACKs from the respective > maintainers. I am assuming for DAX patches we need ACK from Dan Williams and for virtio patches we need ack from Michael S. Tsirkin. Dan, Michael, can you please review the dax and virtio patches respectively and if there are no concerns, please provide ACK. Or suggest an alternative way of how these patches can be merged. Thanks Vivek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD666C433DF for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A74552073A for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hJM2otlY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A74552073A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F4685D39; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a_ynO3XNWEGn; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F17985B4D; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAFBC0864; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD061C004D for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EA285B4D for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDFdRxwoXez9 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A7CE85A76 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597064904; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pbpPyMxeUTZufAlT4TB0KbZ9dM5w1NZ9B6YwnpXi1/s=; b=hJM2otlYUoPY7VxeCg+9S/SuDdXK/EMb63r95YBavEpwFYYx2bHe7xw5vabFMzkA9bv3aG GO+rnV5h9LFmhpGEzzGShn29p21HXvBnVGFrRX+y6S4jLgkre3rLGiwT2g0SAsWo7octz4 xzEhTG6JX1B3/EzsojREJRmGfBPmSv8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-98-bwrUS9gAOm6o0zWQN2BguA-1; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bwrUS9gAOm6o0zWQN2BguA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B63918A0F03; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from horse.redhat.com (unknown [10.10.115.251]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EAE10013C2; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by horse.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 10451) id 3286022036A; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:09 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: Miklos Szeredi , Dan Williams , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support Message-ID: <20200810130809.GA455528@redhat.com> References: <20200807195526.426056-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-fs-list , Stefan Hajnoczi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:29:47AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:55 PM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > Most of the changes are limited to fuse/virtiofs. There are couple > > of changes needed in generic dax infrastructure and couple of changes > > in virtio to be able to access shared memory region. > > So what's the plan for merging the different subsystems? I can take > all that into the fuse tree, but would need ACKs from the respective > maintainers. I am assuming for DAX patches we need ACK from Dan Williams and for virtio patches we need ack from Michael S. Tsirkin. Dan, Michael, can you please review the dax and virtio patches respectively and if there are no concerns, please provide ACK. Or suggest an alternative way of how these patches can be merged. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:08:09 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal Message-ID: <20200810130809.GA455528@redhat.com> References: <20200807195526.426056-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support List-Id: Development discussions about virtio-fs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Miklos Szeredi , Dan Williams , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-fs-list , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:29:47AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:55 PM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > Most of the changes are limited to fuse/virtiofs. There are couple > > of changes needed in generic dax infrastructure and couple of changes > > in virtio to be able to access shared memory region. > > So what's the plan for merging the different subsystems? I can take > all that into the fuse tree, but would need ACKs from the respective > maintainers. I am assuming for DAX patches we need ACK from Dan Williams and for virtio patches we need ack from Michael S. Tsirkin. Dan, Michael, can you please review the dax and virtio patches respectively and if there are no concerns, please provide ACK. Or suggest an alternative way of how these patches can be merged. Thanks Vivek