From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=HpxS=BU=vger.kernel.org=linux-man-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B34C433E0
	for <linux-man@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:16:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0543F2070B
	for <linux-man@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:16:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726937AbgHJOQu (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-man@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:16:50 -0400
Received: from l2mail1.panix.com ([166.84.1.75]:50004 "EHLO l2mail1.panix.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726932AbgHJOQu (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-man@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:16:50 -0400
X-Greylist: delayed 1106 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:16:48 EDT
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89])
        by l2mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BQHcH3MG6zF78
        for <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5])
        by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BQHcF2qpgz1nS4;
        Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:58:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by panix5.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 415)
        id 4BQHcF3LcjzfYm; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:58:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:58:21 -0400
From:   Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@panix.com>
To:     Larry Dwyer <larryd.kbd@gmail.com>
Cc:     Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
        austin-group-l@opengroup.org, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
        Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
        Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
        Andrew Josey <ajosey@opengroup.org>,
        Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
        linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
        Geoff Clare <gwc@opengroup.org>,
        Elliot Hughes <enh@google.com>,
        libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
Message-ID: <20200810135821.GA11918@panix.com>
References: <CALxWeYrisuzEPVEHOQSFJ8G_=8-VTAOTNBquyszOZMid7YfT=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <6425d636-7f48-3a73-ef0e-7bb5b991360c@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6425d636-7f48-3a73-ef0e-7bb5b991360c@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-man.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 04:18:10PM -0700, Larry Dwyer via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
> How about the "control" side and the "terminal" side (of the paired device
> files)?

How about the "pty side" and the "tty side"?  It seems hard to be more
neutral than that and we can be sure there is no ambiguity.

Thor