From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TVD_SUBJ_WIPE_DEBT,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B9DC433DF for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4418220829 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727964AbgHLMxS (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:53:18 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44502 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726698AbgHLMxP (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:53:15 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4186A1045; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E54AE3F70D; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:53:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Russell King , Morten Rasmussen , Dietmar Eggemann , mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Quentin Perret Subject: [PATCH v5 01/17] ARM, sched/topology: Remove SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:52:44 +0100 Message-Id: <20200812125300.11889-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200812125300.11889-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> References: <20200812125300.11889-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This flag was introduced in 2014 by commit d77b3ed5c9f8 ("sched: Add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain") but AFAIA it was never leveraged by the scheduler. The closest thing I can think of is EAS caring about frequency domains, and it does that by leveraging performance domains. Remove the flag. Cc: Russell King Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider --- arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 2 +- include/linux/sched/topology.h | 13 ++++++------- kernel/sched/topology.c | 10 +++------- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c index b5adaf744630..353f3ee660e4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid) static inline int cpu_corepower_flags(void) { - return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN; + return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES; } static struct sched_domain_topology_level arm_topology[] = { diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h index 820511289857..6ec7d7c1d1e3 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h @@ -18,13 +18,12 @@ #define SD_WAKE_AFFINE 0x0010 /* Wake task to waking CPU */ #define SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY 0x0020 /* Domain members have different CPU capacities */ #define SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY 0x0040 /* Domain members share CPU capacity */ -#define SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN 0x0080 /* Domain members share power domain */ -#define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 0x0100 /* Domain members share CPU pkg resources */ -#define SD_SERIALIZE 0x0200 /* Only a single load balancing instance */ -#define SD_ASYM_PACKING 0x0400 /* Place busy groups earlier in the domain */ -#define SD_PREFER_SIBLING 0x0800 /* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain */ -#define SD_OVERLAP 0x1000 /* sched_domains of this level overlap */ -#define SD_NUMA 0x2000 /* cross-node balancing */ +#define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 0x0080 /* Domain members share CPU pkg resources */ +#define SD_SERIALIZE 0x0100 /* Only a single load balancing instance */ +#define SD_ASYM_PACKING 0x0200 /* Place busy groups earlier in the domain */ +#define SD_PREFER_SIBLING 0x0400 /* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain */ +#define SD_OVERLAP 0x0800 /* sched_domains of this level overlap */ +#define SD_NUMA 0x1000 /* cross-node balancing */ #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT static inline int cpu_smt_flags(void) diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c index 9079d865a935..865fff3ef20a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c @@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static int sd_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd) SD_BALANCE_EXEC | SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY | - SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | - SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)) { + SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) { if (sd->groups != sd->groups->next) return 0; } @@ -180,8 +179,7 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent) SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY | SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | - SD_PREFER_SIBLING | - SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN); + SD_PREFER_SIBLING); if (nr_node_ids == 1) pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE; } @@ -1292,7 +1290,6 @@ int __read_mostly node_reclaim_distance = RECLAIM_DISTANCE; * SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY - describes SMT topologies * SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES - describes shared caches * SD_NUMA - describes NUMA topologies - * SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN - describes shared power domain * * Odd one out, which beside describing the topology has a quirk also * prescribes the desired behaviour that goes along with it: @@ -1303,8 +1300,7 @@ int __read_mostly node_reclaim_distance = RECLAIM_DISTANCE; (SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | \ SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | \ SD_NUMA | \ - SD_ASYM_PACKING | \ - SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN) + SD_ASYM_PACKING) static struct sched_domain * sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, -- 2.27.0 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TVD_SUBJ_WIPE_DEBT, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2079DC433DF for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAA2220829 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OrKKg4kc" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DAA2220829 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=slGsIKj3SGZw1pYAOrli3qQMxSqYMhwj4/+eTH6R75Y=; b=OrKKg4kc4jW8tvKMTTJDl8JAQ WU7zd28YLAZAZmtycm0wcX3PAJTsuxEvND/kgOjLgeGOqjfqV6ZV18a0fqkMm5OW1TCdNBXDhiqKT CURO504FozXk1JrV4OdOs07BX8BgZrjirKHXgKxf6JtNjgweJ0lB2c57+/za9O24IIS+lfmOLc+fT q2pW8c2SRJH4YjA9vGFbgiuUBcDiSX+EWuYJeTixGNK1zxIig8zRcVoEC2p8S92KhrCA00gD0R+Nu HUqwsT4WS3o1MYQI0osd9cUWXjog1wTtEbABIHR4+jtKovl16AyA971ZZynEpojPVuYiC06B12JSH tXMFbW+Zg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k5qGG-00042k-C8; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:53:44 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k5qFt-0003rE-25 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:53:26 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4186A1045; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E54AE3F70D; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 05:53:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v5 01/17] ARM, sched/topology: Remove SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:52:44 +0100 Message-Id: <20200812125300.11889-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200812125300.11889-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> References: <20200812125300.11889-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200812_085321_410608_F4816667 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.44 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Morten Rasmussen , vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Quentin Perret , peterz@infradead.org, Russell King , Dietmar Eggemann , mingo@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This flag was introduced in 2014 by commit d77b3ed5c9f8 ("sched: Add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain") but AFAIA it was never leveraged by the scheduler. The closest thing I can think of is EAS caring about frequency domains, and it does that by leveraging performance domains. Remove the flag. Cc: Russell King Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider --- arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 2 +- include/linux/sched/topology.h | 13 ++++++------- kernel/sched/topology.c | 10 +++------- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c index b5adaf744630..353f3ee660e4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid) static inline int cpu_corepower_flags(void) { - return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN; + return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES; } static struct sched_domain_topology_level arm_topology[] = { diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h index 820511289857..6ec7d7c1d1e3 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h @@ -18,13 +18,12 @@ #define SD_WAKE_AFFINE 0x0010 /* Wake task to waking CPU */ #define SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY 0x0020 /* Domain members have different CPU capacities */ #define SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY 0x0040 /* Domain members share CPU capacity */ -#define SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN 0x0080 /* Domain members share power domain */ -#define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 0x0100 /* Domain members share CPU pkg resources */ -#define SD_SERIALIZE 0x0200 /* Only a single load balancing instance */ -#define SD_ASYM_PACKING 0x0400 /* Place busy groups earlier in the domain */ -#define SD_PREFER_SIBLING 0x0800 /* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain */ -#define SD_OVERLAP 0x1000 /* sched_domains of this level overlap */ -#define SD_NUMA 0x2000 /* cross-node balancing */ +#define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 0x0080 /* Domain members share CPU pkg resources */ +#define SD_SERIALIZE 0x0100 /* Only a single load balancing instance */ +#define SD_ASYM_PACKING 0x0200 /* Place busy groups earlier in the domain */ +#define SD_PREFER_SIBLING 0x0400 /* Prefer to place tasks in a sibling domain */ +#define SD_OVERLAP 0x0800 /* sched_domains of this level overlap */ +#define SD_NUMA 0x1000 /* cross-node balancing */ #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT static inline int cpu_smt_flags(void) diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c index 9079d865a935..865fff3ef20a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c @@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static int sd_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd) SD_BALANCE_EXEC | SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY | - SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | - SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)) { + SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) { if (sd->groups != sd->groups->next) return 0; } @@ -180,8 +179,7 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent) SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY | SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | - SD_PREFER_SIBLING | - SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN); + SD_PREFER_SIBLING); if (nr_node_ids == 1) pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE; } @@ -1292,7 +1290,6 @@ int __read_mostly node_reclaim_distance = RECLAIM_DISTANCE; * SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY - describes SMT topologies * SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES - describes shared caches * SD_NUMA - describes NUMA topologies - * SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN - describes shared power domain * * Odd one out, which beside describing the topology has a quirk also * prescribes the desired behaviour that goes along with it: @@ -1303,8 +1300,7 @@ int __read_mostly node_reclaim_distance = RECLAIM_DISTANCE; (SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | \ SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | \ SD_NUMA | \ - SD_ASYM_PACKING | \ - SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN) + SD_ASYM_PACKING) static struct sched_domain * sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, -- 2.27.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel