From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C015AC433DF for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F4C204EC for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:53:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597690416; bh=eD/OFt1++bnzXdDBZwIFG18Hdy1KClaBq7QVFbnSbVo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=ZjV5c+oRNg7srn3NKs+oXA1jhV6XYbd8zQkthUxEdkfyrAYmn36GxXxOa6lGgmtwZ UqJg/0cZ6qdgQcuvRlRZaJd1PyMPuPPEkPJT//iFxfMa1aEYG0l5X2xbpc/HdAfenA +7qgIo1RYkiegeHHYUHYXzzP4rribVlEeNzFj5M8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391787AbgHQSxf (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:53:35 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37340 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387814AbgHQPvr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:51:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCB2120657; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:51:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597679506; bh=eD/OFt1++bnzXdDBZwIFG18Hdy1KClaBq7QVFbnSbVo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=C7rmBEmDMioYi23UERrSv2zGEEE6k3mMZU9IJmRI8sfq1ZJlKReT6KetNCKgzseL3 Y9YEMcrLzMj5izifgA/XXBCpXVhX9JbgbS7xgsRfX+DnET2vHd9hZtflJDo9H3DH1T cYMD9uKaN0+gDEMcKMzwjAyvXp9M1eG9prsNxLzg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Seth Forshee , Ilya Leoshkevich , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.7 236/393] s390/bpf: Fix sign extension in branch_ku Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:14:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20200817143831.066765186@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20200817143819.579311991@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200817143819.579311991@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ilya Leoshkevich [ Upstream commit 7477d43be5b1448bc0d4c85cb185a0144cc080e1 ] Both signed and unsigned variants of BPF_JMP | BPF_K require sign-extending the immediate. JIT emits cgfi for the signed case, which is correct, and clgfi for the unsigned case, which is not correct: clgfi zero-extends the immediate. s390 does not provide an instruction that does sign-extension and unsigned comparison at the same time. Therefore, fix by first loading the sign-extended immediate into work register REG_1 and proceeding as if it's BPF_X. Fixes: 4e9b4a6883dd ("s390/bpf: Use relative long branches") Reported-by: Seth Forshee Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Tested-by: Seth Forshee Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200717165326.6786-3-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 19 ++++--------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 0f37a1b635f85..ac227ea13cbe7 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1416,21 +1416,10 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, } break; branch_ku: - is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32; - /* clfi or clgfi %dst,imm */ - EMIT6_IMM(is_jmp32 ? 0xc20f0000 : 0xc20e0000, - dst_reg, imm); - if (!is_first_pass(jit) && - can_use_rel(jit, addrs[i + off + 1])) { - /* brc mask,off */ - EMIT4_PCREL_RIC(0xa7040000, - mask >> 12, addrs[i + off + 1]); - } else { - /* brcl mask,off */ - EMIT6_PCREL_RILC(0xc0040000, - mask >> 12, addrs[i + off + 1]); - } - break; + /* lgfi %w1,imm (load sign extend imm) */ + src_reg = REG_1; + EMIT6_IMM(0xc0010000, src_reg, imm); + goto branch_xu; branch_xs: is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32; if (!is_first_pass(jit) && -- 2.25.1