From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF509C433DF for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F6920720 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727834AbgHUSSC (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:18:02 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:18326 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726851AbgHUSSC (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:18:02 -0400 IronPort-SDR: aD82iQbtYwx99ZsuLJbGq0EjMO9fRFeZZTGTSFFEPhzZq/EkMCkIMhiF3ohfE7hhvrqYKPJSd4 1l6D6qdwhzgg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9720"; a="240430475" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,338,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="240430475" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Aug 2020 11:18:02 -0700 IronPort-SDR: wBw3XeBwvHQzaudncojCBfacgAW1JLN+BoS3GeEGLzxUvK14b6Y3NklAz6GZdGA0xkCNq+xj6a 0xx6mUXWJeGA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,338,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="498056540" Received: from jbrandeb-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.212.38.54]) by fmsmga006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Aug 2020 11:18:01 -0700 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:18:00 -0700 From: Jesse Brandeburg To: Igor Russkikh Cc: , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Ariel Elior , Michal Kalderon , "Alexander Lobakin" , Michal Kalderon Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 02/10] qed/qede: make devlink survive recovery Message-ID: <20200821111800.00004fb1@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200820185204.652-3-irusskikh@marvell.com> References: <20200820185204.652-1-irusskikh@marvell.com> <20200820185204.652-3-irusskikh@marvell.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Igor Russkikh wrote: > Devlink instance lifecycle was linked to qed_dev object, > that caused devlink to be recreated on each recovery. > > Changing it by making higher level driver (qede) responsible for its > life. This way devlink now survives recoveries. > > qede now stores devlink structure pointer as a part of its device > object, devlink private data contains a linkage structure, > qed_devlink. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin > Signed-off-by: Michal Kalderon > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c > index 140a392a81bb..93071d41afe4 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c > @@ -1170,10 +1170,23 @@ static int __qede_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 dp_module, u8 dp_level, > rc = -ENOMEM; > goto err2; > } > + > + edev->devlink = qed_ops->common->devlink_register(cdev); > + if (IS_ERR(edev->devlink)) { > + DP_NOTICE(edev, "Cannot register devlink\n"); > + edev->devlink = NULL; > + /* Go on, we can live without devlink */ > + } > } else { > struct net_device *ndev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > > edev = netdev_priv(ndev); > + > + if (edev && edev->devlink) { > + struct qed_devlink *qdl = devlink_priv(edev->devlink); > + > + qdl->cdev = cdev; > + } > edev->cdev = cdev; > memset(&edev->stats, 0, sizeof(edev->stats)); > memcpy(&edev->dev_info, &dev_info, sizeof(dev_info)); same comment as against old version: cppcheck notes that the edev check here before the && is either unnecessary, or the original code had a possible null pointer dereference. I figure the code should just be if (edev->devlink) { And I recommend that you try to run cppcheck --enable=all on your code, it finds several style violations and a few other null pointer checks that can be fixed up.