From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: work around clang IAS bug referencing __force_order
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 03:41:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200822084133.GL28786@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200822035552.GA104886@rani.riverdale.lan>
Hi Arvind,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:55:52PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> Cc Segher.
>
> Segher, we were looking at gcc PR82602, where IRA could reorder volatile
> asm's (reported on ARM). The fix was backported to gcc-6.
I know ;-)
> Do you know if
> there is any reason the problem couldn't occur on x86 on older gcc
> without the fix?
No, I see no particular reason, at least GCC 5 seems vulnerable. (The
GCC 5 release branch was closed at the time this bug report was made,
already). There is no reason I see why it would work on x86 but fail
elsewhere, either.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-22 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 13:53 [PATCH] x86: work around clang IAS bug referencing __force_order Arnd Bergmann
2020-08-01 11:50 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-06 22:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-07 7:03 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-04 0:09 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-08-14 17:29 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-14 21:19 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-14 22:57 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-08-15 0:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-08-15 3:28 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-15 8:23 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-15 10:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-15 14:39 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-16 9:37 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-06 22:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-13 0:12 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-08-13 8:49 ` David Laight
2020-08-13 17:20 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-13 17:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-13 17:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-08-13 18:09 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-13 18:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-08-20 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-20 13:06 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-21 0:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-21 23:04 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-21 23:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-08-21 23:25 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-22 0:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-22 3:55 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-22 8:41 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2020-08-22 9:23 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-22 9:51 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-08-22 10:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-08-22 10:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-08-22 18:17 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-08-22 21:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-22 23:10 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-23 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-23 1:16 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-23 21:25 ` [PATCH] x86/asm: Replace __force_order with memory clobber Arvind Sankar
2020-08-24 17:50 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-08-24 19:13 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-08-25 15:19 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-25 15:21 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-09-02 15:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Arvind Sankar
2020-09-02 15:58 ` David Laight
2020-09-02 16:14 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-09-02 16:08 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-09-02 20:26 ` David Laight
2020-09-02 17:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-09-02 17:36 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-09-02 18:19 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-09-02 18:24 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-09-02 23:21 ` [PATCH v3] " Arvind Sankar
2020-09-03 2:17 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-03 5:34 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-09-30 20:50 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-01 10:12 ` [tip: x86/asm] x86/asm: Replace __force_order with a " tip-bot2 for Arvind Sankar
2020-10-13 9:30 ` tip-bot2 for Arvind Sankar
2020-08-22 21:17 ` [PATCH] x86: work around clang IAS bug referencing __force_order Arvind Sankar
2020-08-23 13:31 ` David Laight
2020-09-08 22:25 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200822084133.GL28786@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.