From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AA6C433E3 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E7920738 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:26:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598257601; bh=Z5v3yALan58X82pcXsq2Jd8sMAElN8QVKUbO2NvOlRg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=u5LQ67SGnwA5UbysWnFIlEpxEQ6fq5pB32a0GSH8aKF9Qbho4s6bUqXjlhHwRHZjF nIg3pSe7+N/3myno0LgmlJ4idu5iC+t8Ad5jyJotuHetIz9TwIIPnN88SBNMP471EG qmRp7hr6/O47FpbOzNlH5RimKFib1s5dDqG+Ikxo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726037AbgHXI0k (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 04:26:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:36868 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726580AbgHXI0k (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 04:26:40 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y3so7744775wrl.4; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EwnSSERLhwr59xH9xxkGQsLVrHFbS0iVSLa9oXTssQk=; b=YvAiqwspAmuXiL5s6NXaoIOF7kqM7eENiu4/xt+fLd5D0OmZaKtebJTGgoLIo/5N1G CF+bhSSlDsu/ThNuuejVpQqF9KkKVUIMIZCZpE/4FGYL1QIRar4OOhap+hy76ICDJp8v 6KBGfSEk8HkSISwzz1QTBU8fSRZio8pJVyD/pFqfRouhtYy0PzicuYHb5oSBYwIBKcby 8YiCoqdhR9O/AAt+DQoj4YgxKtfKMQUb5aZ6HBAyuqsq6ywE4DzyhK/+Xqoa2fr0Fb9L MTRQYRG2UFP2iopBMCVrmwwLmcIZ/9Er5W4l3oTPtLLd0tOZ6M9U5U/Hu/i3HBTue276 W8IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Q/NvyXjvs0PMm0aISfz8THiPYt1+jbKq2+VNJbhNGuuoGJp8w 4fRmw4MTn8Z+LIvvNopJXU0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfwbFUcMPFowdfSohjmf5Een0Qin2LUBTL30LqpiJthvHEC+F/P+baWuv3HPZCiDCL8xSSCg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a11d:: with SMTP id o29mr4769908wro.421.1598257597768; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kozik-lap ([194.230.155.216]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm22173394wmc.28.2020.08.24.01.26.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:26:35 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Marek Szyprowski , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Lukasz Luba Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: big.LITTLE: enable driver only on Peach-Pit/Pi Chromebooks Message-ID: <20200824082635.GA15030@kozik-lap> References: <20200616081230.31198-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20200616081230.31198-3-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20200817153908.GA13144@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:15:42AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 17/08/2020 17:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> > >> On 6/16/20 10:12 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >>> This driver always worked properly only on the Exynos 5420/5800 based > >>> Chromebooks (Peach-Pit/Pi), so change the required compatible string to > >>> the 'google,peach', to avoid enabling it on the other Exynos 542x/5800 > >>> boards, which hangs in such case. The main difference between Peach-Pit/Pi > >>> and other Exynos 542x/5800 boards is the firmware - Peach platform doesn't > >>> use secure firmware at all. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > > This patch waited on list for almost two months and was not picked up. > > Therefore I'll take it for v5.10. > > It happens some patches can fall into the cracks, especially when we are > fully busy with a peak of work. Also, we have filters in our mailers > which are not perfect. A gentle ping is enough to ask to pay attention > to the series. > > I can understand that is annoying, but preemptively pick the patch is > not adequate. I apologize if my message was harsh or sounded rude. That was not my intention. I understand that patches soometimes got missed. That's life. This patch here is quite simple, non-intrusive, got independent ack. Also in the past SoC-specific drivers were sometimes going through SoC tree (so in this case - mine for Samsung). Patch also blocks the dependant DT change (for entire cycle). Therefore I guessed that it won't be a problem and it is just simpler to apply it. If it is an issue, I can drop it and rebase my branch. Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7852EC433DF for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 470CC20738 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="r8tIgQn6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 470CC20738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=/hIsIsLrluxC6LJFrScS7o33/iHCPq6MHlJj02gqypw=; b=r8tIgQn6csINI13JmgKdDep2W 7FCa9KdJyjJZQ54Bv/jcdM3iMmyVFCfhxiyFLDvyUsodtIwj6P6s57fZBbWWsPBEclVobrQX3LWJK ysMciqXZZLe5NSbfNr/A1XgzMBUe27V9UKckuaT+bNDOI5KJSnv5afofXjtIk9v8OoiCbaMaeU2l9 obb4iwGxgnJn8S7aM0jlH1ja5DiCjJgMTeJwjex0jlv7SHY9F1s37PamuVzFZDBJcPGvrTF9UBCOV MhWxda7nHLGtBkSiRkrij2xuwKPRiGeaAFuUxnKGaM9MCBfmrL1CMLft8TMmOM6hlYMxCJ/940bTv CvaT1xduA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kA7oQ-0008JN-6d; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:26:42 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kA7oN-0008ID-Gi for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:26:40 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id a15so7741024wrh.10 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EwnSSERLhwr59xH9xxkGQsLVrHFbS0iVSLa9oXTssQk=; b=c5dZJiDjp62jkC6wAzeTK/HB7l3zlvTCIHAN1P8pEFJp1HwhzCJ/qQ9WGjYwBuMrJz ySLKpmqeKSyaX6yvqTbQ5SpsK/iL0LPWAnWhw0cWce3xA6IsuLE2Cqo/r/BdaCd4zH9r lbwVK3v46fwRHYuvZD+02YeYz1Fw7JW3PUuxo42TANd1a6lgLKWWIKSoUTvFdY9IQdin eavqGQ5W7MWaLX+XMIh98JOE2z4EnHjchcUzs9kB7VrxT0v9VKFRDPWMF5i4oyutAhT3 0H2YiljBLQiQfU9Fh+DYuv5SUdQoqAw2PkwPjVnIoUrk1JeCeeULirzx0YUFHVkqdQ2f iWSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533L76YgKlN7iP6iOHYNaMWC2WFm+Hz/frY8VT+ekQ3y18wkU0pl jAe7vJPyBEE4STkUQs8TpNI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfwbFUcMPFowdfSohjmf5Een0Qin2LUBTL30LqpiJthvHEC+F/P+baWuv3HPZCiDCL8xSSCg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a11d:: with SMTP id o29mr4769908wro.421.1598257597768; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kozik-lap ([194.230.155.216]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm22173394wmc.28.2020.08.24.01.26.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:26:35 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: big.LITTLE: enable driver only on Peach-Pit/Pi Chromebooks Message-ID: <20200824082635.GA15030@kozik-lap> References: <20200616081230.31198-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20200616081230.31198-3-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20200817153908.GA13144@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200824_042639_608687_FC728DB4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.40 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Lukasz Luba , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marek Szyprowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:15:42AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 17/08/2020 17:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> > >> On 6/16/20 10:12 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >>> This driver always worked properly only on the Exynos 5420/5800 based > >>> Chromebooks (Peach-Pit/Pi), so change the required compatible string to > >>> the 'google,peach', to avoid enabling it on the other Exynos 542x/5800 > >>> boards, which hangs in such case. The main difference between Peach-Pit/Pi > >>> and other Exynos 542x/5800 boards is the firmware - Peach platform doesn't > >>> use secure firmware at all. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > > This patch waited on list for almost two months and was not picked up. > > Therefore I'll take it for v5.10. > > It happens some patches can fall into the cracks, especially when we are > fully busy with a peak of work. Also, we have filters in our mailers > which are not perfect. A gentle ping is enough to ask to pay attention > to the series. > > I can understand that is annoying, but preemptively pick the patch is > not adequate. I apologize if my message was harsh or sounded rude. That was not my intention. I understand that patches soometimes got missed. That's life. This patch here is quite simple, non-intrusive, got independent ack. Also in the past SoC-specific drivers were sometimes going through SoC tree (so in this case - mine for Samsung). Patch also blocks the dependant DT change (for entire cycle). Therefore I guessed that it won't be a problem and it is just simpler to apply it. If it is an issue, I can drop it and rebase my branch. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel