Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c

between commit:

  9f1345737790 ("ibmvnic fix NULL tx_pools and rx_tools issue at do_reset")

from the net tree and commit:

  507ebe6444a4 ("ibmvnic: Fix use-after-free of VNIC login response buffer")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index d3a774331afc,86a83e53dce5..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@@ -475,17 -467,12 +467,15 @@@ static int init_stats_token(struct ibmv
  static int reset_rx_pools(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
  {
  	struct ibmvnic_rx_pool *rx_pool;
+ 	u64 buff_size;
  	int rx_scrqs;
  	int i, j, rc;
- 	u64 *size_array;
  
 +	if (!adapter->rx_pool)
 +		return -1;
 +
- 	size_array = (u64 *)((u8 *)(adapter->login_rsp_buf) +
- 		be32_to_cpu(adapter->login_rsp_buf->off_rxadd_buff_size));
- 
- 	rx_scrqs = be32_to_cpu(adapter->login_rsp_buf->num_rxadd_subcrqs);
+ 	buff_size = adapter->cur_rx_buf_sz;
+ 	rx_scrqs = adapter->num_active_rx_pools;
  	for (i = 0; i < rx_scrqs; i++) {
  		rx_pool = &adapter->rx_pool[i];
  
@@@ -652,10 -637,7 +640,10 @@@ static int reset_tx_pools(struct ibmvni
  	int tx_scrqs;
  	int i, rc;
  
 +	if (!adapter->tx_pool)
 +		return -1;
 +
- 	tx_scrqs = be32_to_cpu(adapter->login_rsp_buf->num_txsubm_subcrqs);
+ 	tx_scrqs = adapter->num_active_tx_pools;
  	for (i = 0; i < tx_scrqs; i++) {
  		rc = reset_one_tx_pool(adapter, &adapter->tso_pool[i]);
  		if (rc)