All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Allison Collins <allison.henderson@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:58:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831155848.GF6096@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxh+fLzGTVbXEB8L__jVQCbw53GxcYYv96=2N0-piHz4-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:07:14AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 9:08 AM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This series performs some refactoring of our timestamp and inode
> > encoding functions, then retrofits the timestamp union to handle
> > timestamps as a 64-bit nanosecond counter.  Next, it adds bit shifting
> > to the non-root dquot timer fields to boost their effective size to 34
> > bits.  These two changes enable correct time handling on XFS through the
> > year 2486.
> >
> > On a current V5 filesystem, inodes timestamps are a signed 32-bit
> > seconds counter, with 0 being the Unix epoch.  Quota timers are an
> > unsigned 32-bit seconds counter, with 0 also being the Unix epoch.
> >
> > This means that inode timestamps can range from:
> > -(2^31-1) (13 Dec 1901) through (2^31-1) (19 Jan 2038).
> >
> > And quota timers can range from:
> > 0 (1 Jan 1970) through (2^32-1) (7 Feb 2106).
> >
> > With the bigtime encoding turned on, inode timestamps are an unsigned
> > 64-bit nanoseconds counter, with 0 being the 1901 epoch.  Quota timers
> > are a 34-bit unsigned second counter right shifted two bits, with 0
> > being the Unix epoch, and capped at the maximum inode timestamp value.
> >
> > This means that inode timestamps can range from:
> > 0 (13 Dec 1901) through (2^64-1 / 1e9) (2 Jul 2486)
> >
> > Quota timers could theoretically range from:
> > 0 (1 Jan 1970) through (((2^34-1) + (2^31-1)) & ~3) (16 Jun 2582).
> >
> > But with the capping in place, the quota timers maximum is:
> > max((2^64-1 / 1e9) - (2^31-1), (((2^34-1) + (2^31-1)) & ~3) (2 Jul 2486).
> >
> > v2: rebase to 5.9, having landed the quota refactoring
> > v3: various suggestions by Amir and Dave
> > v4: drop the timestamp unions, add "is bigtime?" predicates everywhere
> > v5: reintroduce timestamp unions as *legacy* timestamp unions
> 
> I went over the relevant patches briefly.
> I do not have time for thorough re-review and seems like you have enough
> reviewers already, but wanted to say that IMO v5 is "approachable" for
> novice xfs developers and I can follow the conversions easily, so that's
> probably a good thing ;-)

<nod> Thanks for the review!  Good to see you at LPC last week too!

--D

> Thanks,
> Amir.

      reply	other threads:[~2020-08-31 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-31  6:06 [PATCH v5 00/11] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038 Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31  6:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: explicitly define inode timestamp range Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  8:18   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-31  6:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: refactor quota expiration timer modification Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: refactor default quota grace period setting code Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: refactor quota timestamp coding Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: move xfs_log_dinode_to_disk to the log recovery code Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  8:19   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: redefine xfs_timestamp_t Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31 16:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-01  8:40   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: redefine xfs_ictimestamp_t Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31 16:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-01  9:04   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: widen ondisk inode timestamps to deal with y2038+ Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31 16:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-31 19:44     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01 11:44   ` Gao Xiang
2020-09-01 17:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: widen ondisk quota expiration timestamps to handle y2038+ Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: trace timestamp limits Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01 11:46   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-31  6:07 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: enable big timestamps Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31 16:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-01 11:47   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-31  8:07 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038 Amir Goldstein
2020-08-31 15:58   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200831155848.GF6096@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.