From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32321C433E2 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0517A21481 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729363AbgIGMxB (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:53:01 -0400 Received: from relay-b01.edpnet.be ([212.71.1.221]:57726 "EHLO relay-b01.edpnet.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729320AbgIGMw0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:52:26 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1093 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 08:52:25 EDT X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1599482039-0a7ff516007298d0001-ZXuqFv Received: from zotac.vandijck-laurijssen.be (77.109.119.65.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net [77.109.119.65]) by relay-b01.edpnet.be with ESMTP id c7pA46IDNvqzkT87; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 14:33:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: 77.109.119.65.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net[77.109.119.65] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 77.109.119.65 Received: from x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be (74.250-240-81.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [81.240.250.74]) by zotac.vandijck-laurijssen.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61460101A9C3; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:33:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:33:56 +0200 From: Kurt Van Dijck To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: tom_usenet@optusnet.com.au, henrique ricardo figueira , linux-can@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Questions about using multiple sockets Message-ID: <20200907123356.GA15060@x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Questions about using multiple sockets Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Hartkopp , tom_usenet@optusnet.com.au, henrique ricardo figueira , linux-can@vger.kernel.org References: <20200903054724.x6giher7ldmuvbac@pengutronix.de> <1116be40-25c4-002e-8455-5d5f86ac6e03@optusnet.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Barracuda-Connect: 77.109.119.65.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net[77.109.119.65] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1599482039 X-Barracuda-URL: https://212.71.1.221:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at edpnet.be X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 274 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Bayes: SPAM GLOBAL 0.9947 1.0000 4.2819 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 4.28 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=4.28 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.84464 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-can@vger.kernel.org > > The 'problem' seems to be already introduced by that specific ECU ;-) In my experience, it's hard to use 29bit CAN id's mixed with J1939. But the 11bit CAN id range is free to use without any conflict with j1939. I've seen some uses of this 11bit id's. Kurt