From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA352C43461 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CF021481 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 14:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729591AbgIGOM4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:12:56 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:29586 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729791AbgIGOI5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:08:57 -0400 IronPort-SDR: qtwwns37usp1CEb0AcIjSgOVgTTY1EAgXlXpHSpw5GXK9yZVdMyOcS/IIkmEpxQ1ib0brF5mlA a5SePSPxMXkw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9736"; a="176061444" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,402,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="176061444" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Sep 2020 07:08:35 -0700 IronPort-SDR: IyIJpGb7PSXbGv9nFa3L9iLxdTpINyOkMblbQ1eaJEL8yCHiEA1yOEq+JfOtmTBVxynSnAZUDe vS/OhuaQ/YPg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,402,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="333173796" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2020 07:08:32 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kFHor-00Ey3d-4e; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:08:29 +0300 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:08:29 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Walleij , Kent Gibson , Randy Dunlap , Bartosz Golaszewski , Jonathan Corbet , Mika Westerberg , linux-gpio , linux-doc , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/23] Documentation: gpio: add documentation for gpio-mockup Message-ID: <20200907140829.GL1891694@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20200904154547.3836-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20200904154547.3836-24-brgl@bgdev.pl> <26ea1683-da8f-30e7-f004-3616e96d56b3@infradead.org> <20200907095932.GU1891694@smile.fi.intel.com> <20200907115310.GA1891694@smile.fi.intel.com> <20200907122238.GA1849893@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:49:23PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 2:22 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 02:06:15PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: ... > > Yes it is. Or at least until you fix all existing users so that if you > > do change it, no one notices it happening :) > > > > Then another question is: do we really want to commit to a stable ABI > for a module we only use for testing purposes and which doesn't > interact with any real hardware. > > Rewriting this module without any legacy cruft is tempting though. :) Another thought spoken loudly: maybe it can be unified with GPIO aggregator code? In that case it makes sense. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko