From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FE0C43461 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCEE207DE for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="MkLV2iGR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731021AbgIIQSG (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:18:06 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:64112 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730885AbgIIQN0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:13:26 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 089G3hGt094150; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:12:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=l58yEDHShi5ObMeKXd9i1HaDyPqzpve8oVA61+yeocE=; b=MkLV2iGRLrJMnX5uAc0U1tKsI6PtfCpTFLq0ne+qlZoGDxasR0vpXy0ZPQFv53fQioKS Njkr3bSJU9cSed7Dznmbo9BmJczRYk4RfUadU7jKzxZzmlvIbclW1mWXcF38rx/3YBHD DHGFzRfbHRhULHpR4pMwew+G5+a7cM4wQ8S6KHO0/Vn8+p0qPD1IaNDa27Ys8fdQ7ayu mkAPh04ADJ9xzS/1izjRTf5b07VXHfPvqzONbas5SsWm0Wr8YBUObSz63a3/j7CZP7rT EXGtrBqSj1ncxxjLbt/3Wb6mGFGOd2DCOaIuQKq8Kp7HtL1bzAl06aqbqtEuMqwEMpQZ BA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33eyv56ynt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:12:20 -0400 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 089G4E1s096945; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:12:19 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33eyv56yn1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:12:19 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 089GA6XD019174; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:17 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 33e5gmrvyy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:12:17 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 089GCEnm26673490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:14 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E2111C054; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E726D11C052; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thinkpad (unknown [9.171.79.102]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:12:11 +0200 From: Gerald Schaefer To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Mike Rapoport , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , linux-mm , Paul Mackerras , linux-sparc , Alexander Gordeev , Claudio Imbrenda , Will Deacon , linux-arch , linux-s390 , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Richard Weinberger , linux-x86 , Russell King , Jason Gunthorpe , Ingo Molnar , Catalin Marinas , Andrey Ryabinin , Heiko Carstens , Arnd Bergmann , John Hubbard , Jeff Dike , linux-um , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm , linux-power , LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding Message-ID: <20200909181211.1cad8d28@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> References: <20200907180058.64880-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> <20200907201256.GC1976319@kernel.org> <9bde9857-fdfd-e384-ea27-a14e5a06f1e6@csgroup.eu> <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-09_09:2020-09-09,2020-09-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009090139 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:36:50 +0200 Gerald Schaefer wrote: [..] > > It seems now that the generalization is very well accepted so far, > apart from some apparent issues on arm. Also, merging 2 + 3 and > putting them first seems to be acceptable, so we could do that for > v3, if there are no objections. > > Of course, we first need to address the few remaining issues for > arm(32?), which do look quite confusing to me so far. BTW, sorry for > the compile error with patch 3, I guess we did the cross-compile only > for 1 + 2 applied, to see the bloat-o-meter changes. But I guess > patch 3 already proved its usefulness by that :-) Umm, replace "arm" with "power", sorry. No issues on arm so far, but also no ack I think. Thanks to Christophe for the power change, and to Mike for volunteering for some cross compilation and cross-arch testing. Will send v3 with merged and re-ordered patches after some more testing. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerald Schaefer Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:12:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding Message-Id: <20200909181211.1cad8d28@thinkpad> List-Id: References: <20200907180058.64880-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> <20200907201256.GC1976319@kernel.org> <9bde9857-fdfd-e384-ea27-a14e5a06f1e6@csgroup.eu> <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Mike Rapoport , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , linux-mm , Paul Mackerras , linux-sparc , Alexander Gordeev , Claudio Imbrenda , Will Deacon , linux-arch , linux-s390 , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Richard Weinberger , linux-x86 , Russell King , Jason Gunthorpe , Ingo Molnar , Catalin Marinas , Andrey Ryabinin , Heiko Carstens , Arnd Bergmann , John Hubbard , Jeff Dike , linux-um , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm , linux-power , LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:36:50 +0200 Gerald Schaefer wrote: [..] > > It seems now that the generalization is very well accepted so far, > apart from some apparent issues on arm. Also, merging 2 + 3 and > putting them first seems to be acceptable, so we could do that for > v3, if there are no objections. > > Of course, we first need to address the few remaining issues for > arm(32?), which do look quite confusing to me so far. BTW, sorry for > the compile error with patch 3, I guess we did the cross-compile only > for 1 + 2 applied, to see the bloat-o-meter changes. But I guess > patch 3 already proved its usefulness by that :-) Umm, replace "arm" with "power", sorry. No issues on arm so far, but also no ack I think. Thanks to Christophe for the power change, and to Mike for volunteering for some cross compilation and cross-arch testing. Will send v3 with merged and re-ordered patches after some more testing. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D7EC433E2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465E1207DE for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="MkLV2iGR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 465E1207DE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BmnKF33jMzDqZX for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:19:29 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=MkLV2iGR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bmn9r20cBzDqB2 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:13:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 089G3hGt094150; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:12:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=l58yEDHShi5ObMeKXd9i1HaDyPqzpve8oVA61+yeocE=; b=MkLV2iGRLrJMnX5uAc0U1tKsI6PtfCpTFLq0ne+qlZoGDxasR0vpXy0ZPQFv53fQioKS Njkr3bSJU9cSed7Dznmbo9BmJczRYk4RfUadU7jKzxZzmlvIbclW1mWXcF38rx/3YBHD DHGFzRfbHRhULHpR4pMwew+G5+a7cM4wQ8S6KHO0/Vn8+p0qPD1IaNDa27Ys8fdQ7ayu mkAPh04ADJ9xzS/1izjRTf5b07VXHfPvqzONbas5SsWm0Wr8YBUObSz63a3/j7CZP7rT EXGtrBqSj1ncxxjLbt/3Wb6mGFGOd2DCOaIuQKq8Kp7HtL1bzAl06aqbqtEuMqwEMpQZ BA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33eyv56ynt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:12:20 -0400 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 089G4E1s096945; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:12:19 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33eyv56yn1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:12:19 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 089GA6XD019174; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:17 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 33e5gmrvyy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:12:17 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 089GCEnm26673490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:14 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E2111C054; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E726D11C052; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thinkpad (unknown [9.171.79.102]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:12:11 +0200 From: Gerald Schaefer To: Christophe Leroy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding Message-ID: <20200909181211.1cad8d28@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> References: <20200907180058.64880-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> <20200907201256.GC1976319@kernel.org> <9bde9857-fdfd-e384-ea27-a14e5a06f1e6@csgroup.eu> <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-09_09:2020-09-09, 2020-09-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009090139 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , linux-mm , Paul Mackerras , linux-sparc , Alexander Gordeev , Claudio Imbrenda , Will Deacon , linux-arch , linux-s390 , Vasily Gorbik , Jason Gunthorpe , Richard Weinberger , linux-x86 , Russell King , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Ryabinin , Jeff Dike , Arnd Bergmann , John Hubbard , Heiko Carstens , linux-um , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Andrew Morton , linux-power , Mike Rapoport Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:36:50 +0200 Gerald Schaefer wrote: [..] > > It seems now that the generalization is very well accepted so far, > apart from some apparent issues on arm. Also, merging 2 + 3 and > putting them first seems to be acceptable, so we could do that for > v3, if there are no objections. > > Of course, we first need to address the few remaining issues for > arm(32?), which do look quite confusing to me so far. BTW, sorry for > the compile error with patch 3, I guess we did the cross-compile only > for 1 + 2 applied, to see the bloat-o-meter changes. But I guess > patch 3 already proved its usefulness by that :-) Umm, replace "arm" with "power", sorry. No issues on arm so far, but also no ack I think. Thanks to Christophe for the power change, and to Mike for volunteering for some cross compilation and cross-arch testing. Will send v3 with merged and re-ordered patches after some more testing. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593F2C43461 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0839207DE for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="SoZPBCAK"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="MkLV2iGR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F0839207DE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ilzzTuxFt8TxCcjRIB0jGkHNik6StyL8nEQBTtBO+hw=; b=SoZPBCAKk0h8TWK1F+uu4tF3g Uku3BCKqJrSkwejO5UUpvg8jpSHfCjk6fRlbydMD1lVnMRmIEigfRq64Sk8uvEDSYw/S2rfztksZ0 47Tr8PrRo0QdasSNCp4+negURawUXznpo4SMpS5yr8mh5dldjiFfvQUVLDWpB2MjK7O9USQ/Puhkx T5cgRmOQztQzQFy2rSUXwsbJqwMBTN3j+yjkrPr93+bOUgF5UuMkUtxdSGm7Nex0XhMUTpgkGGsCC 1zrHwKwEknFwcQ4aEkUm63Nxk1WzMJu6udYa5Uk8ea9gA8LQbdA8bcJhlgFu2xuK+DBByMN1HCacu hIJAAx/7g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kG2iU-00041L-Ul; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:13:02 +0000 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kG2iS-00040t-GY; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:13:01 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 089G3hGt094150; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:12:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=l58yEDHShi5ObMeKXd9i1HaDyPqzpve8oVA61+yeocE=; b=MkLV2iGRLrJMnX5uAc0U1tKsI6PtfCpTFLq0ne+qlZoGDxasR0vpXy0ZPQFv53fQioKS Njkr3bSJU9cSed7Dznmbo9BmJczRYk4RfUadU7jKzxZzmlvIbclW1mWXcF38rx/3YBHD DHGFzRfbHRhULHpR4pMwew+G5+a7cM4wQ8S6KHO0/Vn8+p0qPD1IaNDa27Ys8fdQ7ayu mkAPh04ADJ9xzS/1izjRTf5b07VXHfPvqzONbas5SsWm0Wr8YBUObSz63a3/j7CZP7rT EXGtrBqSj1ncxxjLbt/3Wb6mGFGOd2DCOaIuQKq8Kp7HtL1bzAl06aqbqtEuMqwEMpQZ BA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33eyv56ynt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:12:20 -0400 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 089G4E1s096945; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:12:19 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33eyv56yn1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:12:19 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 089GA6XD019174; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:17 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 33e5gmrvyy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:12:17 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 089GCEnm26673490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:14 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E2111C054; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E726D11C052; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thinkpad (unknown [9.171.79.102]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:12:11 +0200 From: Gerald Schaefer To: Christophe Leroy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding Message-ID: <20200909181211.1cad8d28@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> References: <20200907180058.64880-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> <20200907201256.GC1976319@kernel.org> <9bde9857-fdfd-e384-ea27-a14e5a06f1e6@csgroup.eu> <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-09_09:2020-09-09, 2020-09-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009090139 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200909_121300_687263_D849626E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.18 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , linux-mm , Paul Mackerras , linux-sparc , Alexander Gordeev , Claudio Imbrenda , Will Deacon , linux-arch , linux-s390 , Vasily Gorbik , Jason Gunthorpe , Richard Weinberger , linux-x86 , Russell King , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Ryabinin , Jeff Dike , Arnd Bergmann , John Hubbard , Heiko Carstens , linux-um , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Andrew Morton , linux-power , Mike Rapoport Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:36:50 +0200 Gerald Schaefer wrote: [..] > > It seems now that the generalization is very well accepted so far, > apart from some apparent issues on arm. Also, merging 2 + 3 and > putting them first seems to be acceptable, so we could do that for > v3, if there are no objections. > > Of course, we first need to address the few remaining issues for > arm(32?), which do look quite confusing to me so far. BTW, sorry for > the compile error with patch 3, I guess we did the cross-compile only > for 1 + 2 applied, to see the bloat-o-meter changes. But I guess > patch 3 already proved its usefulness by that :-) Umm, replace "arm" with "power", sorry. No issues on arm so far, but also no ack I think. Thanks to Christophe for the power change, and to Mike for volunteering for some cross compilation and cross-arch testing. Will send v3 with merged and re-ordered patches after some more testing. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:12:11 +0200 From: Gerald Schaefer Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding Message-ID: <20200909181211.1cad8d28@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> References: <20200907180058.64880-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> <20200907201256.GC1976319@kernel.org> <9bde9857-fdfd-e384-ea27-a14e5a06f1e6@csgroup.eu> <20200908193650.1c1511d0@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , linux-mm , Paul Mackerras , linux-sparc , Alexander Gordeev , Claudio Imbrenda , Will Deacon , linux-arch , linux-s390 , Vasily Gorbik , Jason Gunthorpe , Richard Weinberger , linux-x86 , Russell King , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Andrey Ryabinin , Jeff Dike , Arnd Bergmann , John Hubbard , Heiko Carstens , linux-um , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Andrew Morton , linux-power , Mike Rapoport On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:36:50 +0200 Gerald Schaefer wrote: [..] > > It seems now that the generalization is very well accepted so far, > apart from some apparent issues on arm. Also, merging 2 + 3 and > putting them first seems to be acceptable, so we could do that for > v3, if there are no objections. > > Of course, we first need to address the few remaining issues for > arm(32?), which do look quite confusing to me so far. BTW, sorry for > the compile error with patch 3, I guess we did the cross-compile only > for 1 + 2 applied, to see the bloat-o-meter changes. But I guess > patch 3 already proved its usefulness by that :-) Umm, replace "arm" with "power", sorry. No issues on arm so far, but also no ack I think. Thanks to Christophe for the power change, and to Mike for volunteering for some cross compilation and cross-arch testing. Will send v3 with merged and re-ordered patches after some more testing. _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um