From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: "Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aleksa Sarai" <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Christian Brauner" <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
"Christian Heimes" <christian@python.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Deven Bowers" <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
"Eric Chiang" <ericchiang@google.com>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Lakshmi Ramasubramanian" <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@google.com>,
"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
"Miklos Szeredi" <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Trébuchet" <philippe.trebuchet@ssi.gouv.fr>,
"Scott Shell" <scottsh@microsoft.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Steve Dower" <steve.dower@python.org>,
"Steve Grubb" <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
"Thibaut Sautereau" <thibaut.sautereau@clip-os.org>,
"Vincent Strubel" <vincent.strubel@ssi.gouv.fr>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 0/3] Add introspect_access(2) (was O_MAYEXEC)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:40:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200910184033.GX6583@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <880bb4ee-89a2-b9b0-747b-0f779ceda995@digikod.net>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:38:21PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> There is also the use case of noexec mounts and file permissions. From
> user space point of view, it doesn't matter which kernel component is in
> charge of defining the policy. The syscall should then not be tied with
> a verification/integrity/signature/appraisal vocabulary, but simply an
> access control one.
permission()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 16:46 [RFC PATCH v9 0/3] Add introspect_access(2) (was O_MAYEXEC) Mickaël Salaün
2020-09-10 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v9 1/3] fs: Add introspect_access(2) syscall implementation and related sysctl Mickaël Salaün
2020-09-10 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v9 2/3] arch: Wire up introspect_access(2) Mickaël Salaün
2020-09-15 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-10 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v9 3/3] selftest/interpreter: Add tests for introspect_access(2) policies Mickaël Salaün
2020-09-10 17:04 ` [RFC PATCH v9 0/3] Add introspect_access(2) (was O_MAYEXEC) Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-10 17:21 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-09-10 17:47 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-09-10 18:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-09-10 18:38 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-09-10 18:40 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-09-10 20:00 ` Al Viro
2020-09-10 20:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-11 12:16 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-09-11 14:15 ` Igor Zhbanov
2020-09-12 0:28 ` James Morris
2020-09-14 16:43 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200910184033.GX6583@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=christian@python.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ericchiang@google.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=philippe.trebuchet@ssi.gouv.fr \
--cc=scottsh@microsoft.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steve.dower@python.org \
--cc=thibaut.sautereau@clip-os.org \
--cc=vincent.strubel@ssi.gouv.fr \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.