From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:28:11 +0200 Subject: [LTP] LTP release In-Reply-To: References: <20200908073138.GB2475@yuki.lan> <20200910084554.GA21741@dell5510> <20200914111543.GE5524@yuki.lan> Message-ID: <20200915052811.GA4719@dell5510> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Tim, Cyril, > I'm also open to suggestions for possible tests. I'd like a shell script command > to add to the list of binary programs. Here is what I've chosen so far: > access01 access01 > chdir01 chdir01 > fork01 fork01 > time01 time01 > wait02 wait02 > write01 write01 > symlink01 symlink01 > stat04 symlink01 -T stat04 > utime01A symlink01 -T utime01 > rename01A symlink01 -T rename01 > splice02 seq 1 20 | splice02 Could we please add at least one network test program? e.g. route tests with netlink also uses shell API and it's really quick (real time 0m0,687s): route6-change-netlink-dst route-change-netlink-dst.sh -6 > This takes about 5 seconds on one of my test machines. +1 > -- Tim > P.S. Maybe, if you're moving away from runltp and ltp-pan, it's a little late to be > adding some selftests to make sure they work correctly. But Fuego is using them. > I don't know what other frameworks use when they invoke LTP to perform > tests. > P.P.S How come some tests produce TPASS and some produce just PASS? Legacy C API and shell API (both legacy and new) add T (i.e. TPASS), new C API don't add it (i.e. PASS). It's a minor detail we could fix that. Kind regards, Petr