All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
	Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK
	<linux-"@smtpin17.hostedemail.com
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:22:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915062253.GA26275@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHrDU50D08TwLfzz2hCK+8+C7KGPF99PphXtsOYZ-ff1g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:20:59AM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> The documentation of kmap_atomic() states the following:
> 
>  * The use of kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic is discouraged - kmap/kunmap
>  * gives a more generic (and caching) interface. But kmap_atomic can
>  * be used in IRQ contexts, so in some (very limited) cases we need
>  * it.
> 
> so if this is no longer accurate, perhaps we should fix it?

This hasn't been accurate for at least ten years :)

> But another reason I tried to avoid kmap_atomic() is that it disables
> preemption unconditionally, even on 64-bit architectures where HIGHMEM
> is irrelevant. So using kmap_atomic() here means that the bulk of
> WireGuard packet encryption runs with preemption disabled, essentially
> for legacy reasons.

Agreed.  We should definitely fix that.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-@freedesktop.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:22:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915062253.GA26275@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHrDU50D08TwLfzz2hCK+8+C7KGPF99PphXtsOYZ-ff1g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:20:59AM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> The documentation of kmap_atomic() states the following:
> 
>  * The use of kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic is discouraged - kmap/kunmap
>  * gives a more generic (and caching) interface. But kmap_atomic can
>  * be used in IRQ contexts, so in some (very limited) cases we need
>  * it.
> 
> so if this is no longer accurate, perhaps we should fix it?

This hasn't been accurate for at least ten years :)

> But another reason I tried to avoid kmap_atomic() is that it disables
> preemption unconditionally, even on 64-bit architectures where HIGHMEM
> is irrelevant. So using kmap_atomic() here means that the bulk of
> WireGuard packet encryption runs with preemption disabled, essentially
> for legacy reasons.

Agreed.  We should definitely fix that.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-@freedesktop.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:22:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915062253.GA26275@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHrDU50D08TwLfzz2hCK+8+C7KGPF99PphXtsOYZ-ff1g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:20:59AM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> The documentation of kmap_atomic() states the following:
> 
>  * The use of kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic is discouraged - kmap/kunmap
>  * gives a more generic (and caching) interface. But kmap_atomic can
>  * be used in IRQ contexts, so in some (very limited) cases we need
>  * it.
> 
> so if this is no longer accurate, perhaps we should fix it?

This hasn't been accurate for at least ten years :)

> But another reason I tried to avoid kmap_atomic() is that it disables
> preemption unconditionally, even on 64-bit architectures where HIGHMEM
> is irrelevant. So using kmap_atomic() here means that the bulk of
> WireGuard packet encryption runs with preemption disabled, essentially
> for legacy reasons.

Agreed.  We should definitely fix that.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
	Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux->
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:22:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915062253.GA26275@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHrDU50D08TwLfzz2hCK+8+C7KGPF99PphXtsOYZ-ff1g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:20:59AM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> The documentation of kmap_atomic() states the following:
> 
>  * The use of kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic is discouraged - kmap/kunmap
>  * gives a more generic (and caching) interface. But kmap_atomic can
>  * be used in IRQ contexts, so in some (very limited) cases we need
>  * it.
> 
> so if this is no longer accurate, perhaps we should fix it?

This hasn't been accurate for at least ten years :)

> But another reason I tried to avoid kmap_atomic() is that it disables
> preemption unconditionally, even on 64-bit architectures where HIGHMEM
> is irrelevant. So using kmap_atomic() here means that the bulk of
> WireGuard packet encryption runs with preemption disabled, essentially
> for legacy reasons.

Agreed.  We should definitely fix that.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-@freedesktop.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:22:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915062253.GA26275@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHrDU50D08TwLfzz2hCK+8+C7KGPF99PphXtsOYZ-ff1g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:20:59AM +0300, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> The documentation of kmap_atomic() states the following:
> 
>  * The use of kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic is discouraged - kmap/kunmap
>  * gives a more generic (and caching) interface. But kmap_atomic can
>  * be used in IRQ contexts, so in some (very limited) cases we need
>  * it.
> 
> so if this is no longer accurate, perhaps we should fix it?

This hasn't been accurate for at least ten years :)

> But another reason I tried to avoid kmap_atomic() is that it disables
> preemption unconditionally, even on 64-bit architectures where HIGHMEM
> is irrelevant. So using kmap_atomic() here means that the bulk of
> WireGuard packet encryption runs with preemption disabled, essentially
> for legacy reasons.

Agreed.  We should definitely fix that.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-15  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 282+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14 20:42 [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 01/13] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 02/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 03/13] preempt: Clenaup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 10:56   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 04/13] lockdep: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 16:11   ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:11     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 05/13] mm/pagemap: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  0:52   ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15  0:52     ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15  2:40   ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15  5:28   ` kernel test robot
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 06/13] locking/bitspinlock: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 16:10   ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10     ` [Intel-gfx] " Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:10     ` Will Deacon
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 07/13] uaccess: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 08/13] sched: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 10:56   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 10:56     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 09/13] ARM: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 10/13] xtensa: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 11/13] drm/i915: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 12/13] rcutorture: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42 ` [patch 13/13] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_COUNT from Kconfig Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 20:54 ` [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54   ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:54   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-14 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 20:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 21:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 21:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-14 22:24     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24       ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37         ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-14 22:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  3:21         ` [PATCH] crypto: lib/chacha20poly1305 - Set SG_MITER_ATOMIC unconditionally Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:21           ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:21           ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:21           ` [Intel-gfx] " Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:21           ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  3:30         ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:03           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:40             ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:45           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:55             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  7:05               ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  7:10                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  9:34                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 10:02                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 10:05                     ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 10:08                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15 10:10                         ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15 19:04                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  7:08               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20         ` [patch 00/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20           ` [Intel-gfx] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:20           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-15  6:22           ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2020-09-15  6:22             ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:22             ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:22             ` [Intel-gfx] " Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:22             ` Herbert Xu
2020-09-15  6:39             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:39               ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  6:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  7:24               ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  7:24                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  7:24                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 17:29                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:29                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15  8:39       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  8:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  8:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  8:39         ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15  8:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 17:35         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35           ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 17:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-15 19:57           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-15 19:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-16 18:34             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34               ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16  7:37           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16  7:37             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16  7:37             ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16  7:37             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16  7:37             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 15:29             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29               ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 15:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 18:32               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 18:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-16 20:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:43                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17  6:38                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17  6:38                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17  6:38                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17  6:38                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17  6:38                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-16 20:29               ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29                 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29                 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:29                 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 20:58                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:58                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 21:43                   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43                     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43                     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 21:43                     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 22:39                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 22:39                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17  7:52                       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17  7:52                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17  7:52                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17  7:52                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17  7:52                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-17 16:28                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-17 16:28                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-29  8:19                     ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:23                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:23                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:23                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:23                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:21                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:20                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:20                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:20                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:20                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  8:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29  9:00                       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:00                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:00                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:00                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:00                         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29 14:54                         ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-29 14:54                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-16 19:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 19:23       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-16 20:48       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48         ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-16 20:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-15 17:25     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-14 22:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200915062253.GA26275@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc="open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK <linux-"@smtpin17.hostedemail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcain@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.